Yeah but that’s not really a top tier vehicle
It’s because the sales, and BMPT, two things ruined RU teams for months, we need to wait for these empty heads get out of RU tech tree, and OBJ195 need to come first in my opinion
1 Like
It’s gonna be like playing T80U when come to game, gun repair simulator
For sure the armor will leave a lot to desire, it’s widely known that most of the material armor is in the hull frontal arc primarly protecting the crew. Vehicles like Strv 122B+ with a good balance of all-around armor coverage is something that fits the current War Thunder meta if we put on that. APS interception of projectiles, specially supersonic, if not hypersonic projectiles in War Thunder still pretty inconsistent. T-14 could be added for sake of content in the long term.
one update season russia no have tahat good wn and need another mbt? other nations suffer one year min and no problem…
There are 2 new T-80 variants and a T-90M variant to add, if not more.
Those being the following
T-80UA (The rare sister production to the 2005 T-80UE-1)
T-90M2 Ryvok-1 (An extremely new project that hasn’t been photographed but is known to exist based on engineer statements, leaked documents, and various reports)
T-80UD 2026 (A modern equivalent to the T-80BVM using left over T-80UD models without a proper name)
Also, Gaijin, please, for the love of god, model hydropneumatic suspension on the 2S25.
Man, I still can’t believe China and Israel are approaching 100% win rate at top tier, while Italy and Israel are going strong with around 7k/D.
Or in other words why WT Data Project is not trustworthy, simply due to the sample it takes, and we should move on.
And no, T-14 should not come.
2 Likes
Even though it’s flawed data to some degree, it’s a bit more accurate for nations that have a large player base, like Russia. In this case, I’m mostly certain that the low win rate comes strictly from experienced players jumping on the US lineup for the new SEPv3 instead of the lackluster T-90MA.
Larger sample size = generally more accurate
It’s almost like that chart is complete nonsense, using a data pool that’s too small to form anything conclusive
Much more accurate chart, even if it forgoes K/D, as realisticaly the K/D of an entire tech tree doesn’t mean much.
^ this is ground RB as of July. ^
4 Likes
I am not denying the fact Russia has a low WR right now, it’s true, it’s just that WT Data Project, even for big 3, takes too small of an sample to be used as a proof of anything.
If that were the case, Merkavas and Arietes would need to start shooting rubber bullets.
1 Like
Russia has to make the tank first lmao
3 Likes
My statement flew over your head. Israel and Italy players are a small percentage of the playerbase and a fraction of the statistics for Statshark. The US, Germany, and Russia are way more represented, so it’s more accurate for them.
We’ll probably see an upgraded T-90M Arena before we see this thing.
Like what lmao. They now have the most advanced t90M unless they add the side armour that was added for about a day
Supposedly there’s work being done to add more charges to Arena-M. Going from 12 to 36.
So something that doesn’t exist yet.
Not like thats going to stop anyone if they want…
Yeah.
Ergo my message-
I meant it sarcastically since I don’t see Gaijin ever adding a T-14.
Can’t add something you don’t know the looks off 🤷♀️
Lol Israel high win rates and frags per death is crazy good. More nerfs incoming!