And with are u talking about
The swedish Tiger is different to the others
How so?
And with are u talking about
Well you brought up 1 off prototypes as a counter argument (I assume counter argument), but there is a very clear difference between a foreign vehicle that were merely “”“tested”“” and used as target practice, and prototypes built by X country being added to X country
- Sorry for the misunderstanding i was wrong on that it was different . 2. I do not really see a problem with that. And how the fuck do you know that it was used as target practice
Oh i didnt saw tht
This looks different to the regular tiger i believe correct me if im wrong
It’s one of the preproduction Tiger IIs. They are called “Tiger II (P)” in the German tech tree.
It is just the same Thx for confirmation
Finnish vehicles are more unique than not.
2 Likes
I do like it tho(i personally do not have problems with copy pasting as long as it is historicaly accurate)
have you even taken 2 seconds to check? a vast majority of the finish tech tree are vehicles from other countries trees.
1 Like
Don’t argue with him
He considers everything unique that plays EXACTLY the same, but has like -1 smoke grenade or a different radio antenna model
3 Likes
Stay on topic pls
BT-42, Vickers MkE, Leopard 2A6, Leopard 2A4, T-55M, T-72M1 [entirely new 3D model made for it that no other tech tree uses], Pyorremyrsky, Morko Morane, Fokker DXXI x2, B239, Ar 196 A-5, J34, T-26E at the least.
14 vehicles.
The other 14 vehicles are the alleged copy-paste, and at least 1 of disputed.
Of course, Finland isn’t the Swedish Tiger 2.
2 Likes
Bit of a correction the non premium fokker is (except the painting) identical to the Dutch version
1 Like
me complaining about copy paste vehicles yet i play through the 10 different sherman vehicles that are basically the same thing at different brs
Vickers, unique, yes.
BT-42 finish vehicle, but not in finish tech tree as i said.
J34, ok.
- there are 3 vehicles that are not cope paste.
yeah no, i’m not gonna waste time here to list all your wrongs with the rest. as we discussed before, the term “copy paste” does NOT mean completely identical. it means identical enough that they on first glance both looks the same and performs the same as another vehicle.
Edit:
also
italy? germany?
like if sweden for example had something in real life even if it was only used for target practice and studying of rounds like the tiger 2 it should come in the game since there is no reason it shouldnt. sweden needs heavy tanks to do daily tasks and battlepass missions with and the 6.7 line up for sweden is kinda dog shite i dont understand why yall complaining about it. we got all of the unique vehicles basically theres only mostly “copy and paste” vehicles to add that are slightly unique or have a different camo or some stuff on it. there isnt really any new rare stuff and gaijin adding slightly different versions of stuff we have to fill up line up its good. i see no problem here
3 Likes
“copy paste” does NOT mean completely identical
Weird… I copied and pasted and it turned out identical…
Italy uses Germany’s T-72M1 model, which itself is different from the T-72A in Soviets.
T-72A, T-72M1 Finland, and T-72M1 Germany are entirely separate models.
Gaijin likely didn’t want to use T-72A’s many years old model for the T-72M1 for Germany.
Visual models are cheaper than the rest of development after all.
2 Likes