Sweden need some 6.7 ATGM carrier, like israeli vehicle Zachlam Tager

[Major_Claymore]

The meme nation!!!

need to get more meme vehicles.

alright but seriously, I think sweden need to get an ATGM carrier that is equal to the zachlam tager in the concept, while i know some designs and swedish vehicles, i just want to know there offical names.

also side question, is there any swedish ATGM carrier that can be placed at 6.7 BR or 7.0 BR that been passed or suggested or not suggested?

thanks

[Thomas_Belgium]

Please visit this Page instead:

What Ground Vehicles are Sweden in most need of ”the wishlist”

Please answer this all you that play sweden. (vote) SPAA, Light tanks, Medium tanks, Heavy tanks. or Speedy Go-carts. (pvtgb 1111 etc.) Or do we need Domesticaly produced Designs ? (More Landsverk, Bofors, Hägglunds, Saab etc. vehicles) More copy-paste (not ideal for me as Sweden feels like it has too much Copy paste with the addition of Great britain and rus- I meant finland to the Swedish TT) Vehicles from Norway, Denmark or finland? talk about other nations too but try not to make it into …

Here’s an example from there (although they would likely be 7.7 or higher):

@LelutooDS

Pvrbbv 2063A:

Pvpjbv 2062A:

These are just 2 of them, id like them all no matter how vulnerable they are

You are specifically looking for vehicles like this one passed to the developers:

Pansarvärnsrobotterrängbil 9032 (Pvrbtgbil 9032) - A puppy with bite

poll poll poll poll [image] Ported over from the old forum, with some touch-ups. In short: An ATGM tank destroyer version developed from the basic pickup version of the Personlastterrängbil 903 (Pltgb 903) ‘Valpen’ (The Puppy) to use the Swedish Army’s new ‘Robot 52’ (Rb 52 (SS.11 MCLOS)) missiles as a tank destroyer. Developed between 1960-1963, and registered in service 1966-1982. Although similar to the basic pickup version, the rear end was modified with two firing ramps for the launch of…

[Just_Baron]

[LightningMoon33]

Why would anyone want anything like the dogsh*t tager?

[Kallu609]

Because MCLOS missile carriers are hilariously bad

[iegaatdao]

The funny

[Zathral]

@Major Claymore

also side question, is there any swedish ATGM carrier that can be placed at 6.7 BR or 7.0 BR that been passed or suggested or not suggested?

Please NO
We have enough cold war gimick stuff at that br which is just deeply unfun - balanced or not