Supermarine Type 317: Britain's Lost Bomber

[Would you like to see this in-game?]
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

Introduction: The Supermarine Type 317 is an interesting aircraft project from a well-renowned aircraft company that has been lost to time, simply being regarded as a footnote in British bomber aircraft development.

image
image

Background: In the mid-1930’s, the Air Staff believed that the heavy bomber would be the most effective weapon for both offensive and defensive operations. This was the time where it was believed that the “bomber would always get through”, which made it an unstoppable strike weapon that could solve many issues. This was also a time of rapid technological advance, with engines increasing in both size and power, and airframe manufacturing techniques making leaps and bounds from design to design. It was thus found necessary to design a new generation of bomber which would carry heavier loads than existing types over longer distances. The Air Staff had also sent fact finding missions to the US, and they were impressed by the projects going on at that point, with aircraft such as the B-17 and B-18 being drawn up and prepared for testing at this point. The UK issued two requirements: B.12/36 and P.13/36 were both issued in order to provide a wide-ranging modernisation to the British bomber fleet. For B.12/36, Shorts and Supermarine were chosen to produce aircraft, their designs becoming the Stirling and the Type 317 respectively.

image

Description: The initial design was the Type 316, a four-engined monoplane of full metal construction, except for the control surfaces, which were fabric covered. The 316 made use of a distributed bomb storage system, as it used a single spar. This reduced wing bending, and allowed for a thinner fuselage. The leading edge was also swept back to a noticeable degree, with the trailing edge being straight and perpendicular to the fuselage. Armament consisted of 29x 250lb (113kg) or 500lb (227kg) or 7x 2000lb (907kg) bombs, or 8x .303in (7.7mm) machine guns. The Type 316 would quickly evolved into the Type 317, essentially becoming a new aircraft design. The wing was changed to one with a linear taper, with the tips and ailerons having an elliptical curvature. The aircraft was designed to be as aerodynamically clean as possible, apart from the rear turret, which did not match up to the fuselage all that well. Additionally, the tail was changed to a twin fin type, as found on other heavy bombers of the time, such as the Halifax. The Type 317 was powered by Bristol Hercules piston engines, with the Type 318 being the Rolls-Royce Merlin-powered variant. Two prototypes were ordered in March 1937. In July, it was decided that the 318 was to be cancelled in order to reduce workload on Supermarine (already busy with the Spitfire) and to help speed up the program. A mock-up was built, which was examined on the 12th of August, and the prototypes began construction. However, they were never completed, as Supermarine prioritised their Spitfire work over the bomber project, with the Air Staff also introducing new types in the meantime. The project’s fate was sealed on the 26th of September, 1940, when the partially completed fuselages were destroyed in an air raid by the Luftwaffe on the Supermarine Itchin factory. The order for the Type 317 was cancelled shortly after.

image

Performance:

Spoiler
Span: 97ft (29.57m)
Length: 73ft 6in (22.40m)
Wing Area: 1,358sq.ft (126.16sq.m)
All-Up-Weight 55,000lb (24,948kg)
Powerplant: 4x 1,315hp (981kW) Bristol Hercules HE.1.SM
Max Speed/Heigh 360mph (579km/h) at 14,500ft (4,420m)
Armament: 29x 250lb (113kg) 0r 500lb (227kg) or 7x 2,000lb (907kg) bombs,

8x 0.303in (7.7mm) machine guns|

Conclusion: The Supermarine Type 317 remains as an interesting project in British bomber development, remaining an interesting “what-if” aircraft for those who have researched it. Though a promising aircraft, Supermarine’s concentration on the Spitfire meant that it was overstretched as a company, and thus had to give the 317 a lower priority. This may have ultimately been the right decision with the benefit of hindsight, with the bomber gap left behind by the cancellation of the type quickly being filled by other aircraft. Still though, one must ponder how a Supermarine heavy bomber would have really turned out.

Sources:

Spoiler

“British Secret Projects 4: Bombers 1935 to 1950” by Tony Buttler

Supermarine Type B12/36, 317 | Key Aero

Planes – The Supermariners

Supermarine B12/36 (Type 316 - 318) | Secret Projects Forum

Might Have Beens

R J Mitchell and Supermarine: R. J. Mitchell’s Bomber and his death.

2 Likes

I see no reason not to want it in game.

1 Like

+1

1 Like

What 2000lb bombs could it use?

1 Like

I’m unsure of the exact type, as they weren’t stated in my sources, but most likely any general purpose bombs from the late 1930’s. I would presume similar loadouts to the Hampden, Stirlings and early Halifaxes.

There are 3 options: The 1900 LB. G.P., the 2000 LB. H.C, or the 2000 LB. A.P.
from my limited knowledge any of them would be used however the H.C. is the one you would want.

1 Like

interesting looking bomber, wonder what other bomb loads it could’ve had, like there’s no mention of a 1000lb loadout

1 Like

I think it was done to show what sort of configurations could be carried more than anything else, as the loadouts were left up to the RAF at the end of the day

ahh i see, still either way wonder if it could ave possibly carried the big bombs such as the 4000lb and 8000lb bombs

It definitely had the weight carrying ability but the size or type of lugs would’ve limited it.

1 Like

true, plus we’re not sure how eep the bomb bay is whether it would have to do what the wellingtons do and fly without bomb doors

It seems unlikely, as the bomb bay seems quite short. That was one of the reasons why the Lancaster quickly took precedence over the Halifax for example, as it had a deeper bomb bay.

was it short? as you would think with the payload numbers suggested it would make it look big or at least deep

I’m basing it off of drawings and the photo of the prototype to be honest, I have nothing else to go buy in regards to the bomb bay

ahh i see, well either way would be nice to see this bomber in game all though no sure where it would fit in

1 Like