Someone is just a hater of new aircraft
2 Likes
I vote against any copypaste, not just aircraft. Especially when added to someforeign tree to “gib experience” that already made major nations obsolete
I think you do not understand what copy and paste is
3 Likes
So a different aircraft
2 Likes
God forbid you guys share something for once.
The Brits already have a dozen American prop planes while they have only one of yours.
If they have to share, So should you.
2 Likes
So both models exist ingame already. As i can see it will use a Lf MK9 model that is ingame. It has also many copies that is unacceptable but gaijin only removes vehicles when china asks for that.
It is a Spitfire with a different engine
If that is an issue for you we can get rid of like all the ww2 planes
1 Like
British tree has many SPitfires already, and all of them differ in ingame model. Having different engine makes nose longer, have more blades or cripped wings. That one utilizes the same model. And i bet if added it would utilize flight performance of one of the existing spitfires.
And what is the issue
We can’t have slightly different spitfires as you demand that they are too simlar so cannot be added
Like what is your point you
You don’t want there to be more similar stuff because what
You just seem to be upset at the wrong things
3 Likes
I mean you can find dozens of UK originated vehicles in pretty much every tree already from props to jets to torpedo boats to battleships. Even more if you count joint development aircraft.
2 Likes
That it is copypaste
Yes
Because copypaste is bad for the economy
Would you say the Swedish mosquito in the battle pass is copy paste?
At least it unilizes a different model, so its debatable. Tho its better than other sweden Mosquitoes thats for sure
(I have realised you have much deeper issues)
3 Likes
What’s the 12th?
Ouuu- 100 voters, nice.
1 Like