SuperHind (Mk.4) Discussion - Specifications, Weaponry, etc

Got addition to Mk82 500lb bombs

1 Like

man, is it just that :(

Does Paramount make any form of disrinction between the SuperHind Mk. II, III, IV, and V? Or are they just all the Night Hawk now?

Mk.3 and 4 are NightHawk now, yes. Mk.5 was only a mockup iirc

I can’t believe South Africa actually made that AI helicopter gunship from MGSV

1 Like

Alright fine. I don’t like it but fine.

image

This is stupid that they called it the Night Hawk, people would confuse this with the F117 NightHawk without context.

Gaijin change name to Superhind

Also got improved thermals, from Gen 1 to Gen 2.

Well it not wrong, but yes Super Hind did look a lot cooler.

atleast we got the clarification of which version of super hind it is

I know. Gaijin is wrong. I changed it to Night Hawk myself.

Well not to be a downer bringing this news, but I think I will still enjoy the Superhind

2 Likes

Is there evidence that this can be mounted on Superhind or can this be assumed

1 Like

Any Ingwe launcher can mount ZT-35, and there are multiple sites mentioning that the SuperHind can carry the ZT-35

Currently at 10.3 with the TTD is good. If adding better atgm would mean it went up in BR I would rather it remained as is.
Now if we could get some form of A2A at the same BR that would be rather nice.

1 Like

I bring my TTD up to 10.7 anyways

1 Like

i mean its still a hind and even on the brochure it says “full spectrum” a2a solutions so i’d guess i can carry iglas or r60’s

That crushes the argument against the brochure because of the Rooivalk image. The devs should probably see this as that was the concern smin raised.

Also this got an update

2 Likes

I’ll get to it once I’m home, and there is a video of ATE saying it has Mokopa integration

1 Like