You can tell him its not mine, its from @mkjlv on tiktok
wart hunger
I hope you are sarcastic
1 Like
People are confusing 117 and 177 again?
5 Likes
Sorry for being just a tad bit more skeptical of Russian procurement than American I guess.
America tends to be far more reliable about actually getting things made, and seeing as we have actual confirmation that AIM-260 is in LRIP, I don’t see why this logic would apply to izd.810 since Izd.810 hasn’t had any meaningful news about it in a year or 3…
Quite a LARGE difference to AIM-260 which has had a decent stream of information coming out every so often.
1 Like
Izd. 177 needs Type 99 mounts like those on the AL-31 Flankers.
AL-41S uses different mounts.
Izd. 177 is not Al-41S.
Also you literally proved it yourself.
117 vs 177
al-41s can be used in old al-31 equipped aircraft though as well. just needs some changes
Really? last I heard the AL-41 needed different mounts.
But alright. Guess I was wrong.
it does need some changes, just that it can be done on any previous flanker platform.
1 Like
so the same as putting F100-PW-229 or even -232 in F15As?
or probably even F110-GE-132
This naming got me confused, I read 117S and 177S as the same thing.
So I guess 117S, 177 and 177S are all separate engines.
2 Likes
This one is just Al-41
1 Like
just another day in the Russian arms industry
1 Like
Well, to be fair, Izd 177 and 177S Is just a factory name. In service it will get something along the usual AL-something
let’s go!
1 Like
John Su57
