That sounds like it would be a funny missile bus then.
And R-27EA/M
Except 1.) the EA doesn’t exist and 2.) was cancelled before this aircraft was ever built
Fake pod
You messaged me with T220 targeting pod, not Sapsan-E buddy
2 Likes
+1 13.7 BR (Air AB, Air RB & Air SB) and 14.3 BR for ground RB
I guess located after MiG-27M & MiG-27K at rank VIII
1 Like
su25k/su39 and su27 cross would be cool, only thing holding su 25/39 back is low top speeds, cant even go mach without overspeed warnings, plus only 4 missles in the form of r60 and r73. This thing would likely be released as a premium for ge or pack though, as most nations have planes at 13.0 but premiums only at around 11.7
one last thing - why do some images of the su34 include canards and others dont. (in case you dont know, its the little triangle wings on the front of plane - like a gripen or j20.)
1 Like
I would prefer this aircraft to the branch tree.
I haven’t seen a photo without canards. Perhaps there were no canards on the prototypes.
I don’t think this plane can easily fight fighters, but its weapons against the ground and the fleet are amazing.
This plane’s engines are too weak for its weight.
1 Like
Yep, but The Platan doesn’t have thermals, which makes The Su34 less usable in GRB Top Tier
ARH missiles Air-to-ground?
The Su-34 is only needed to drop FAB-3000 UMPK bombs.
The Su-35 can perform any task better than the Su-34
4 Likes
And Su-35 got targeting pod with thermals!
I can’t be sure about that.
+1 Ka Chow now that’s what I’m talking about!
Because I love it that’s why!
1 Like
I suggested it for same reason🙃
1 Like
I’d recommend the Sukhoi Su-24 first but i’m fin with either one
Surely a 3rd gen LLTV will be viable compared to a 3rd gen targeting pod…
hopefully Su-34M or whatever they want to call it now will do something about that, but I doubt it