http://scalemodels.ru/modules/forum/img_1547932_1554816720_016.jpg.html
There are tons of blueprints on this site. And Gaijin couldn’t even manage that.
Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35/37 Flanker series & Su-34 Fullback - History, Design, Performance & Dissection
@Ralin
AKU-58 is not possible to hang on the Su-27/30 family on the 1 and 2 points or under the fuselage.
The bomb’s suspension is wrong
Who is in charge of quality control in the first place?
@ron_2303
Without sources i dont forward it
I don’t know where the Su-30SM got the incendiary tanks either.
Can we see gaijin’s resources on this nonsense?
Not to mention IIRC Su-30SM doesnt even have RWR indication on DEV yet
we still have blind spots on the su30sm rwr D: is that realistic at all for a 2013 plane?
@BBCRF do you have any sources for the su30sm rwr? Will we still have to deal with huge blind spots?
yep .The Airplane has no blind spots, this is just another stupidity by Gaijin
Do you guys know if the empty weight is correct as of now? (or if it should be lighter/heavier)
can you make a bug report about it? im kinda tired having to notch missiles based on my eyes only and not my rwr (cause every time i turn i can’t see on the RWR where the missile is exactly)
Its one of the heavy flankers. Even Bars its stupidly heavy at 650k vs Irbis that its around 450k.
no
Not only that!..I don’t know where the Su-30SM is…
1.MiG-29SMT…
2.Su-27SM/SM3_Su-30MKK/Su-30MK2/Su-30M2…
- Video from the crash of the Su-30MK2 in 2912… Камера объективного контроля при крушении самолета Су-30. - смотреть онлайн в поиске Яндекса по Видео
why ? if you have good sources on the rwr, why not help improve the su30sm in wt? i dont get it
For starters, let them hire a decent 3d modeler and FM developer first
normal? the top and bottom huge blind spots arent ‘nomal’ compared to the other 14.0 or even 13.7 rwrs, everytime you turn to -notch- you have to do that base on your eyes only, cause you are ‘blind’ on your rwr, thats why im asking if this is realistic and why we dont have 360 degree rwr