They increased the Oswald efficiency anyways after that report.
Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35/37 Flanker series & Su-34 Fullback - History, Design, Performance & Dissection
This is an incorrect value, the second one I can’t report an error.
30min fuel in game it’s ≈ 7t fuel
Then there is the question of the F-15A…It also has 7 tons?. with a maximum capacity of 6 tons of internal tanks…or the engines are 50 percent more efficient…Our Russian ones, of course, have a higher specific fuel consumption…but not by 50%…
have a higher specific fuel consumption Only up to the AB mode, Then the Americans are worse
2 Likes
See you guys tonight!!!
4 Likes
F-15 has turn radius almost the same as Su-27 at low speed and more deg/s.
Su-27 have radar from Mig-29(9-13)
Soviet bias by the way…
7 Likes
I have the F15J but it seems to turn like a bus
All planes in WT have better turn rate performance especially at low speeds. It’s allow to perform Dogfight with a gun’s. Gajin go into more arcade style than simulation.
In this way Instructor in RB don’t get stupid and players don’t need to strictly keep speed or eye for not extended AoA
what does this mean? translate to peasant language for me please?
N001 now C/P from N019 with 1.5 changes
1 Like
It seems they adjusted the FM to reflect the aircraft with 102% throttle gradient so performance is now higher than expected from the 97.7% chart. Need to determine if this is realistic for continuous use or a MiG-21bis scenario.
The IRST is still the exact same as on the N019, oof.
Also, a beamwidth of 3.0° on both the N001 and APG-63 seems a bit high
so copy paste SMT radar with 1.5 range?
In principle, it was expected from these crooked hands
Not SMT, the basic MiG