Literally spend zero effort in modeling lol
It, honestly, so weird that 30SM having this modeling issues while same Su-33, for isntance, have IIRC correctly modeled area around it canards and wings
(and a screenshot by BBCRF of Su-30SM on dev for comparison)
Poor QC/QA.
added it to the bug report
so, i was looking at the current bug reports from the dev server and i found some relevant for the su30sm:
“old” bug reports:
Su-30SM incorrect crew ejection procedure:
“new” bug reports:
Su-30SM bugged MFD pages:
bug reports accepted:
Su-30SM Thrust Vector Control mode incorrect:
R-77-1 seeker range is underperforming:
Su-30SM wrong pilot model:
Su-30SM wrong dispensers model:
Su-30SM 3D model inaccuracies:
Inaccurate J-11B and Su-30SM afterburner:
Su-30 Radar detects and locks onto chaff:
Manoeuvre mode forcing horizontal angle and using rudders:
N011M GMTI Does not Slave Sight Stabilization:
Su-30SM HUD should display curently selected weapon:
fixed:
N011M Bars Datalink Channels:
SU-30SM HUD Inaccuracy:
Su-30’s canopy is bugged:
Su-30SM N011M Bars Radar elevation missing +/- 5 degrees:
Su-30SM incorrectly indicates engine manufacturer AL-31FP:
Su-30SM IFR Training Bar blocks visibility:
SU30SM HUD NOT SHOWING RADAR TARGETS:
SU30SM missing NCTI in cockpit MFDs:
Su-30 incorrect AoA indicator in the HUD:
Su-30SM incorrect HUD indication:
bug reports rejected (not enough info/not a bug):
SU30SM should not have fuel in the vertical stabilizers:
N011M Bars radar incorrect range:
Su-30SM ineffective yaw motion for TVC:
Issues with the new mechanic “Maneuver Mode”:
N011M and Type 1493 use wrong (old) IRST stats:
N011M and Type 1493 use wrong (old) IRST stats, (Take 2):
11 Likes
damn
1 Like
there were other bug reports, but they were less elaborate and others that were accepted, but I didn’t include them either because i didn’t think it was necessary, lol
1 Like
How gaijin can even justify this… AIM-7P vs R-77-1. (R77-1 are bleeding speed unrealistically and need to be fixed in DEV) : r/Warthunder
Almost like 1 person actually conducted evasive maneuvers to bleed the missile of energy, while the other flew straight into it like an idiot… strange…
4 Likes
to be fair, the su30sm shot the r77-1 from 30km away and it was flying very low compared to the f18 at 4000m of alt… it makes sense that the r77-1 couldn’t hit this, it wasted all its energy going up + turning
2 Likes
Multipath just ate all of his braincells.
Yea that was a terrible shot/play by the flanker. But the missile was already losing way too much speed even before the F-18 did any maneuvers. When the F-18 crank for like 3 second and the R-77-1 lose half it speed.
What is maximum climb rate of Su-30SM?
wait, they added the black camo?
amazing photos :3
Nope, not yet sadly. These are 2 different skins from wt live
Thanks :D
ahhh :( but still, so pretty :3
1 Like
Finally had some time to test the dev server. First of all @Grimtax so happy your radar bug report finally got accepted. The effect was definitely felt on the Su-27SM and EFT (the latter probably also thanks to the new TWS).
Su-30SM is heavy as expected but at least R-77-1 compensates for it… still there were much better choices imho.
9 Likes
i feel like the horizontal elevators of the su30sm are not responsive enough like the su27sm, idk, it feels a little bit weird, i was expecting a heavy plane that would at least have 1 really good turn(better than the su27s/sm/su33) cause of the canards+tvc
but I’m so happy because of the new and good radar that I don’t even care about the FM lol
1 Like