Feel free to be off topic & wrong at the same time. Your own sources speak for themselves and you’ve made a fool of yourself.
Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35/37 Flanker series & Su-34 Fullback - History, Design, Performance & Dissection
1 Like
Neither does the British have anything to do with this subject.
So, its just your interpretation?
How so?
Just admitted right there.
Sounds pretty reasonable to me. No?
You can mess around with people without looking like a clown at the same time btw, put the beers down.
After sales of the Russian Engines were halted. :)
You got me, we all live in Ziggy’s world where the SpaceX uses R-77 grid fins and RD-180’s
This dude is spamming videos. No more lets go to other topic.
One video is truly “spamming”
I admit I don’t.
I never worked before.
Please lets go other topic.
1 Like
We already did, waiting on you
My fans await me…
Also, @_Fantom2451 I apologize. Your topics are tremendously awesome, I only read what is said in them,
But I simply attract those who hate Russian designs. Yes, I get rude with them for it. My apologies for that. You know the Su-27 is my favorite.
It’s fascinating that when I was highlighting the negative aspect of Soviet radars. Remember that?
They were silent, they loved it. The second I say anything good about these designs. All hell breaks loose.
They are NEVER used for brakes.
Reentry speeds are 19,180 mph (30,870 km/h; 8,570 m/s) They is well beyond high hypersonic. Only the Booster can slow retry speeds.
Grid fins are exclusively used for change in attitude (direction) of the rocket. Just like the R-77.
Grid fins are the superior design for directional control at supersonic speeds at beyond.
I was right the entire time. The Russian R-77 is the superior design for supersonic+ flight.
Speed regimes
Hypersonic Mach [5–10) 3,836–7,673 mph (6,173–12,348 km/h; 1,715–3,430 m/s)
High-Hypersonic Mach [10–25) 7,673–19,180 mph (12,348–30,867 km/h; 3,430–8,574 m/s)
Re-entry speeds : Mach ≥25 ≥19,180 mph (30,870 km/h; 8,570 m/s)
May?
The grid fins, originally developed by the Soviet Union half a century earlier as control surfaces for intercontinental ballistic missiles, could be rotated up to 20 degrees and worked well on the big rocket.
Here’s why SpaceX really needed to change out that part on Starship | Ars Technica
R-77 is the superior design. Grid fins are control surfaces. That is an absurd belief they are used as airbrakes LMFAO.
The United States follows suit BEHIND the Russian Federation in ballistic rocket design. Please always do remember this.
Ura
You’ve posted three times, I’ll post now so you can continue putting your lack of understanding on full display
Please stay on the topic at hand.
The R-77 has 4 airbrakes? This level of Ameriboo cope in WT.
We have dude named after Mikoyan’s worst fighter in history claiming the grid fins on the R-77 are actually airbrakes.
Do you have a single shred of evidence they are airbrakes & can be used as such?
Does the MICA also not have a sustainer? Because both it and R77 seem to woble a ton once the booster goes out, probably those oscillations mentioned in the devblogs
2 Likes
I never said that they were airbrakes in the R-77’s implementation. Only in the falcon 9’s.
What is your goal here? To discredit yourself in every way possible?
You are entitled to you own opinions regardless of how absurd they are. But you have zero proof.
They are specifically control surfaces.
Soviet Union invented the technology they are exclusively used for control surfaces. Just like the R-77.
Your buddy is agreeing (concurs) to that notion right now in the topic about soviet space rockets. They are not airbrakes. @Celestia does actually know alot about rockets. I am impressed.