I recently found out about this. Apparently it’s called Su-35UB, and it’s meant to be a trainer for the Su-35(S?).
Supposedly only one was built, it looks weird compared to other Su-30s and Twin Seat Flankers but I can’t put my finger on why.
1 Like
For Su-27M (Su-35) from my understanding. You can see canards and large tail with flat tips.
1 Like
CM-102? I have a sneaking suspicion that it was designed in R-77 dimensions, but can’t prove it
isnt this pretty much just a early Su-30MKI/SM?
Well, lineage wise it technically isn’t. It is a trainer version of a Su-27M, aka Su-35 for export.
Actually disregard that, after checking the development history - it was made in 2000s and supposed to be the best of both worlds - canards and avionics from MKI and bigger tail from Su-27M or Su-30MKK and better engines in the future
Tho this technically literally makes it a dual seater a bit more advanced version Su-27M
2 Likes
Hmm a tgp view that feeds into the MFD? Is this finally opening the road for an IRST that does the same :)
(for a future flanker that is)
HUD view, cool.
1 Like
Also, least cinematic moment you can see xD.
3 Likes
I really wish the TacNav was in a bit higher quality.
it looks a lot more informative than in WT.
2 Likes
even shows your local irl time in the top
1 Like
they only gonna add it for the Su-35 now
MiGs are still there as well
they arent even bothering to look at my bug reports for the fulcrum anymore, that TV+IR display is never coming since they probably cant be bothered to model it
3 Likes
Making MiG-29 not fly like a brick exhausted all of the accumulated goodwill towards Fulcrums, gaijin even had to compensate by stealing R-27s from KR to break even
How much did it cost for a good FM and 64cms instead of 32cms?
