Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35/37 Flanker series & Su-34 Fullback - History, Design, Performance & Dissection (Part 3)

I just picked the first one that appears. But yeah most source states the same facts.

This is our thread comrade, moderators dont come here, post anything you want
image

7 Likes

They have pretty good options.

They got 4 options as far as i know.

Ibris radar / Hawk 2700 / Virupaksha / And the bars upgarded with a aesa disk.

It’ll probably be done a little bit after Al-51.

… anyyyyyyy day now… (never)

i dont know if you guys have seen this, but armenia just intergrated iran glide bomb into their su30sm.
i wonder what other weapons did they intergrated, really hope for a glide ir bomb or a AG missile.

( also sadly i only found the bad quality, feel free to correct me if you got better one)
image


3 Likes

This feature makes me really want the Grom-1s…

(You can select multiple GPS targets on the map and release multiple muntitions at the same time onto different targets)


i think my SM2 entered a shadow zone

1 Like

please gaijin ?

4 Likes

also, big boy su34.

4 Likes

The updated X-ray modules look nice

i just saw, insane.

4 Likes

i think the kh31 is bugged. it says that its 4.5 mach capable but only peak at 3960 km/h.

1 Like

What planes do even carry the kh58ushk(e)

su25t, su39, su24.

so basicly, germany / russia / italy all got kh58 / kh25 sead missile with su22m2 / 3 / 4.

sadly su25sm3 didnt get it. ( i think ? i am not sure )

my question is did china get kh31 from russia ?
if yes, why gaijin chose china kh31 for the su30mkk instead of russian kh31.

Yes it is called YJ-91, specifically it is derived from KH-31P

no, i meant the actual kh31. not the made with the chinese tech.

Because the Su-30MKK is an export variant from Russia

Is it me or are the R-73 just not pulling super hard on Dev?

The reasoning is simple: Gaijin needs to create distinctions but doesn’t want to make extra adjustments to the performance data. The YJ-91 is their best choice—identical performance stats, with only the missile’s visual model changed.

The only genuinely Chinese anti-radiation missile is the CM-102, which features an entirely new model and has not yet had its performance data adjusted. The LD-10, on the other hand, is a result of Gaijin cutting corners—it is modified from the PL-12. Currently, the LD-10 also has a bug: its proximity fuze has not been removed, causing it to detonate within 10 meters of the target, which almost entirely prevents it from dealing damage.Plus, the LD-10 is still classified as an air-to-air loadout, but current anti-radiation missiles can’t lock onto airborne targets.