Epitome of fictional vehicles rn
Su-30SM2 with al41 and irbis (doesnt exist yet), with aesa eurofighter (doesnt exist yet) and F15IA (doesnt exist yet)
3 Likes
Not to correct you but the Qatari Typhoons have AESA Radar ECRS Mk0 AESA and Turkish Typhoons being built will have AESA Radar.
Just because Britain and Germany have not seen an immediate need to refit all of their Typhoons with AESA does not mean it is “fictional” If War was to break out those Radars being put into export models would be prioritised for their own fleets. Similar to how we saw Russian models for export be put into the service of the Rusfed (early on)
1 Like
Typhoons missiles are 30 years old :(
ZK 355 is flying as a ECRS MK2 testbed, and german ECRS MK1 quite literally made its maiden flight with PFAT in july lol, so far from being fake
anyhow offtopic
Why would it have the same coverage as any other jet with L-150? As I’ve said, it’s integrated with its EW suite and thus gains MMWR coverage for 1.2~40ghz coverage instead of the 1.2~18ghz coverage of L-150-30SM. It has 8x more stored emitters than would be on prior L150 installations as well.
It can log far more radar sets than any previous L150 iteration, and with additional radars and better signal processing it can hold long dwell times on LPI radars (if that were to ever be introduced), process a far wider range of signals, and be more precise in aircraft variance.
TsKBA openly advertises the new receiving envelope in both band recognition and threat library to exporters.
Hopefully Su-30SM2 gets this as well, but eh. Hard to find any concrete statements with how turbulent its development has been in the last year.
your words are not a source
and without a source the Su-35S will have the same coverage as any other jet with the L-150
Su-30SM2 has had both AL-41F-1S and N035 since November of 2025 lol
yeah true that is why they are mounting the Bars on the production line
or the fact that the Chief designer says the radar has “nearly double the range” of the Bars
which would still be less than the range of the Irbis
tell me one thing, why would they install a Data link range extender if the irbris has a 300km ish range.
no mention of Al-41 or N035
so cope more
more powerful radar =/= N035
totally impossible that they just further upgraded the bars ig
2 Likes
Why are you sharing a shitty news article?
one that dosent even prove me wrong
I’m sure the whole truth can be found in the horoscope section
stars cannot lie
well everything i have seen point to some sort of a further upgraded N011 instead of the N035
Not sure if the FSB will hunt me down for opening .ru links, what does this article entail?
nothing of worth, and there is 50% of being rerouted to a scam for both links posted above
no proof of N035
You do realize that datalink and single-ship radar capability are two entirely different things, right?
Uh… They did, it’s called the Irbis lmao
Why am I sharing the primary news outlet of the Irkutsk aircraft plant?
Huh, great question…