copefully they implement my report finally…
u can like my comment where i pinged smin abt it
3 Likes
Supported :)
I’m going to laugh if they fix the RWR before the missing flares.
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT @Gunjob @k_stepanovich
This bug was closed with note:
Neither of the highlighted text sections make any mention of using TWS for this guidance, in fact they claim illumination of two targets at the same time. This is more likely to be the ability to provide STT to more than one target, something possible with AESA/PESA radars.
And how are multiple STTs initiated?
By necessity it means you can initiate one STT, and still have your TWS to find the second target and initiate the second STT.
Hence … Guiding (the first) R-27ER in TWS.
Track While Scan doesn’t imply anything about how long and how often each target is illuminated.
Yes to guide R-27ER the radar would need to illuminate the target longer and more often (I.e. “Priority Track”). But it’s still TWS (Track -the illuminated target- While Scanning for other targets)
Note that IRBIS-E is a PESA radar and illumination is also done via the main radar transmitter. It’s not like an APQ-120 with a separate CW illuminator.
“Hard Lock” or “Single Target Track” by definition means the beam is hard locked to and following a single target.
When you lock more than one target it is essentially a “Priority Track” where radar spends more beam time on each target to provide sufficient illumination for semi-active radar homing missiles, in terms of update frequency and duration of each illumination.
All in all, by necessity you have to have access to TWS to find and lock the second target, while the first missile is going towards the first target.
Many such cases.
dont worry i did, no need for that mouth to be wide open.
Airborne sm-sv team
2 Likes
Don’t worry, half of them gonna die with 0 kills because they are played by lobotomites that flock to “most op thing at the time”
1 Like
I hope this gets double pylons like the J-15T.
Tested the speed and FM a bit, and honestly it’s quite enjoyable, perhaps with newer WS-10 engines it might even surpass the SM2 a bit in certain regimes.
It already has same amount of Fox-3s as J-15T so I kinda doubt it.
Why do they look like AKU-170?
No idea
Reason why current oil prices are so high
1 Like
i saw the samething wondering if my dev client had its graphics set to max, but no they are the same as my live. so they tweaked something
Don’t have a Tupolev thread, so I’ll leave this here.
It is now indeed the Bear
2 Likes
Nuclear thunder will pretty much guarantee you the nuke drop with this damage model
1 Like
Plus if you consider that they were ECM stations :)
I just need the Tu-22M3 or Tu-160, for fun.