You do realize ASRAAM still lacks datalink compare to other modern IIR missiles right? In this Case ASRAAM isn’t also super duper weapon system.
I prefer MICA IR/NG IR over ASRAAM any day if that’s the case.
IF this is true. that must be one hell of a fuel to give more bang than 200kg more of fuel.
just check datamines
r-27et:
CAMM:
all the while being much, much lighter and can carry much more quantity of the missile
source
And the difference is only 10 years between r-27et and asraam
That’s why i have significant skepticism about this.
Will be peak stealth Michael gameplay
1 Like
Knowing Gaijin MAW system will detect those long range ir missiles despite their motor burn out in those scenarios, still MICA IR will be pretty deadly in most case scenarios.
MICA NG is a real upgrade over ASRAAM
Probably the most potent IIR missile in the world
Combined with an AESA seeker it is an incredibly capable missile.
1 Like
Su-34 dissagrees
1 Like
yeah i’ve been corrected, camm gets an extra turnover pack that the air launch version doesn’t that contributes to its extra delta V
i guess it’s some extra dense fuel pack that gets discarded after burning down?
1 Like
10 years isn’t something you can underestimate in military technology.
2 Likes
So you’ve played your 3 games for this week eh?
not only in military tech
like look where we have gotten in PC hardware in the past 10 years
1 Like
4 even
1 Like
The turnover pack doesn’t contribute to delta-v, if anything it would reduce delta-v due to being heavier. The missile is propelled out the launch tube by a piston inside the tube so uses none of it’s internal fuel to leave the tube. The turnover pack then just provides a lateral force to turn the missile over before the main motor fires.
You can see the turnover pack provides no propulsion to the missile:
3 Likes
Dw all flankers will get asraam because technically compatible ✌️
3 Likes
MKM situation all over again….
I think gaijin operates on a principle “export version can get everything that domestic one has access too, but any weaponry unique to export version doesn’t get added to the base version”. Otherwise anything with N001VEP would get PL-12 from MKK.
Same goes for Israeli stuff on their F-4, F-15 and F-16s. US has none of that available, despite “technical compatibility”
2 Likes
Does anyone have stuff on the 27SM/30SM/30SM2 FCS? Apparently the Su-35S uses a different FCS which is compatible with the dual racks while the older FCS systems aren’t.