best i have are Su-35 brochures
2 Likes
I dunno how accurate this is but it has stuff on F1 and F1S.
https://www.scribd.com/document/517320719/Module-1-Laboratory-Activity-No-2
It also has some now defunct links at the bottom saying Rosboronexport had a page on the Al-41s.
(http://roe.ru/eng/catalog/aerospace-systems/engines/al-41f-1s/)
Sadly I can’t look at it on the Wayback Machine since Wayback Machine has been refusing to work all day. :/
1 Like
Has anyone heard of N035 and N011M/R TWS just not working? Just a had a friend come into VC and complain about it, supposedly it’s happening to multiple people as well.
1 Like
Pedro Pedro pedro
1 Like
Thank you Noister.
1 Like
For what 😭
4 Likes
Is there any particular reason the Su 34 is missing the double pylons for a bunch of air to ground payload that Su 30 has? Or is it an oversight?
Like what??
Kab 250LG, UPAB 500B
Been a bit annoying for a while. Bothered to ask finally.
I mean according to the brochures it seems accurate.
(we don’t have a good laid out one like this for the 30SM)
If I had to guess, adding the dual pylons would put too much stress on the wing along with all the other armament like Kh-31, 38, 35 ect ect…
Plus the Su-34 carries more A2G munitions than the MKI derivatives anyway, so it may have been an afterthought to make the MKI Derivatives better at A2G?
This is pretty old brochure, aircraft is called Su-32 there. Also we can remove R-27s from the duck based on it lol
1 Like
It was just the clearest pic I found lmao
There seems to be a more modern pamphlet, but I only could find it in horrendous resolution
Dual racks for dumb bombs but not guided bombs…
Yep, thats much better. Now question is was FCS on export model gutted to only be able to operate RVV-MD or is it the same for Russian Ducks as well.
According to Gaijin the Su-34’s Gsh-30 also has 30 more Rounds than advertised.
I have no idea where they got these sources but I’m not complaining.
That makes me sad :(
I just want the 2 x 2 kab 250s :(