and upgraded landing gear.
What the hell
1 Like
It’s the prototype Su-34 I believe.
But it’s Carrier based, built off the Su-33.
Aim9L is the only surprise. The rest is lifted straight from the 1972 airframe.
No it’s the only thing the F-4E has for some reason is a better RWR (So they upgraded the RWR but left the Radar untouched…)
You can see what happens when players add the F-4J and F-4S the Radar is useable and the missiles are time appropriate and can hit low flying MiG 23.
I would say the F-4S and J even an FGR-2 would shorten the gap but the standard F-4E is just sad
Not exactly. Its the combat trainy Su-33 (thus KUB designation - Корабельный Учебно-Боевой)
1 Like
I know that, but I thought that design led to the Su-34, no?
I raise you
KUB with TVC
3 Likes
Against MLD its just hopeless, otherwise its a really solid plane at 11.3.
Its not just as perfect as they described.
Uhhh, no?
All modern EuroCanards looks amazing.
EFT and Rafale shares the top place in my list while J-10C comes second and Jas39E comes third (I know J10C isn’t European but still).
Meh, the EFT looks decent I guess, but it just doesn’t have the sexy curves of the others
Spoiler
Imma be real this is pure bait, I know this is all about personal taste
Of course it is :)
Everyone has different taste and opinions, tho I still dont understand how people loves Canardless flankers more Xd.
I do prefer flankers with canards from most angles
its probably gonna be a pack
otherwise i dont really see how they would add that banner
Ye, it’s an Esports pack.
That’s a cool banner, take my money Gaijin
1 Like
Tu-95 thread got closed and I don’t know where to post, I’ll leave these ones here, since people of this thread are nice.
10 Likes
Sad, now I’ll have to find a new thread to complain about the missing thrust reversal for quicker braking
2 Likes
I couldn’t find it, but I was gonna ask why the Tu-95 was listed as a jet bomber instead of a Turboprop Bomber
1 Like