Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35/37 Flanker series & Su-34 Fullback - History, Design, Performance & Dissection (Part 2)

I don’t even know if the UPG has ASTRA but rwr would be an improvement

1 Like

even with no astra. there are some stuff that can be added. like cas side.

How does the domestic RWR compare to the L-150 anyway?

Also it gets a different CM dispensers as well 4 x 15 cm dispensers on the underside next to the wings (2 each side)

I hope it gets indian betty as well.

1 Like

need that big boy fuel tank

Spoiler

image

Crazy hunchback

In asb it eats good due to the new br brackets



Su-32 as well

First T-10KUB-1 and now this, no just no.

±45 in elevation instead of ±30

Mki gets 2 more antenae on vert stab with the new RWR DHRUTI, so should be almost full spherical except the bottom part

1 Like

Those engines are too strong for flanker airframe structural strength sadly, unless they do composites like chinese.

Used to be great, but as the meta evolved its mid noe, esp because of 13.0 and 13.3 hordes and now the 12.7 f-15a

Grinded till the mech eurofighters with that thing

J-11A is not a designation ever used by PLAAF, the one in game is a sort of MLU version with MAWS and a mech radar made to have datalink with coop from belarus, principly the same plane though, some did suggest that new avionics were used although can’t tell that from the outside.

I mean with J-11B the kinetics is just shy of the very best like ef or rafale or F15E, but it is the best outside those, PL-12 is great in most scenarios if u don’t toss it. Radar is fine and sensors are far better than the A. U are far more competitive in an uptier since u can stay up.

1 Like

bug thunder
image

1 Like

Also just saw a video, did the Su33 just get a buff?
Didn’t used to remember the Su33 had a 2010s engine.

IDK did it have 12t thrust before?

Eh, top speed is good, but TWR and acceleration is something much more important in the meta. You can already see how stupidly good even an absolute boat of a Flanker becomes with AL-41, now imagine if you get even more thrust on a much lighter airframe

It would be awesome, but as i said its too strong for a t-10 airframe structurally irl

If they were too strong, Saturn wouldn’t made them in AL-31 measurements imo. Flankers are quite sturdy, even early ones.

That would require seperate factories in comparision to 177s then

177 is just 177s which goes to higher temperatures for more thrust

They have completely different engine control system. 177 has fully digital controls, while 177S has electromechanical controls, same difference as AL-41F-1 and AL-41F-1S

Going back to the beaten horse, stumbled on pretty cool T-10-5 photo
image
Su-34 got a new challenger for R-27T payload

2 Likes