not surprising, barely any reason to add Su-37 and Su-47 never was armed (but i would love to get both regardless)
1 Like
Because gaijin are bunch of Sukhoi fanboys. I bet they get money from UAC for dicsrimimating MiG aircrafts.
Someone tell this guy that MiG is also part of the UAC
7 Likes
1 Like
Belgium F-35 and Algeria Su-57 for France?
Also french F-22 because one got owned by a Rafale?
2 Likes
I know. But everything inside is controlled by Sukhoi nowadays. They even sabotaged MiG-31 engines production in their hate against MiG.
You do know that until november 2024 UAC was under the ex-direcor of RSK MIG, right?
Why wouldnt they su builds good Aircraft basically the t80 of the Sky
While the mig29 is more a t72
Just thought about this but should the Su-30SM2 actually show up as S35 in RWR warnings instead of S30? Since it has the irbis instead of the bars
Anyway here’s a irbis pic:
Spoiler
10 Likes
Probably, kind of like the F4F ICE shows up as F-18. (or F-20)
1 Like
I bought this up before and yeah, it should.
Su-27 for example is limited to 5.5 gs above Mach 0.85.
Su-57 for example is limited to 6gs above Mach 1
1 Like
Yes for RWR as that would be the airframe most likely to carry the IRBIS Radar
I want them to add the R-27EA just to see the meltdown the community will have
6 Likes
Its seekerhead is garbage
Would Gaijin model it as garbage though
Wasn’t only 27A tested on MiG-29S?
Depens if its different enough
Most flankers Show up has mig29 given its Pretty much the same Radar
And irbis is the same Radar family has bars
Ya