Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35/37 Flanker series & Su-34 Fullback - History, Design, Performance & Dissection (Part 2)

updated server side

dont you have something better to do

1 Like

They’re live

He really doesn’t lmao

Nope. Client side is not the same is server side. Server is actually on .43 whilst clients are on .42. You will be able to notice the changes

man I tested the new FM on 0.42, its on live rn lol

its not for me ?

which aircraft isnt? dude really thinks a dorito can pull 14g at high altitude going mach 1.5

1 Like

Love how it looses no speed even when the airbrake is out ha ha

me when i spread misinformation

7 Likes

He’s flying around in full burner at mach 0.8 with the airbrake out while pulling high levels of G.
It’s nonsense the aircraft would lose energy. Which is hardly does until later in the fight when he throttles down.

Having your foot down cannot negate physics

the airbrake was actually removed from the Su35 because other control surfaces were more efficient at slowing the speed down, the plane itself can even be used as a brake in certain conditions :v

1 Like

Yes many jets have done that, but in game that is not modelled. It’s a Su-27SM I presume acting like it has Thrust vectoring all while flying around losing no energy.

If you guys are happy having this nonsense that’s on you

Its modeled on Raf

1 Like

Airbrake was activated at mach 1.09 at 100% thrust and retracted at mach 0.84, afterburner was never used. This was the only time Karma used airbrake troughout the video. You are simply delusional.

5 Likes

Sure it is just imagine how bad the Spitfire would be if Gaijin added it now.

wdym? my english isnt perfect, and I might not have explained myself very well, I was talking about rafale

110% Thrust is the burner and yes the airbrake is used to slow down and then is retracted. Jet should still lose energy from turning which it doesn’t


me when my eyes can’t even look straight

5 Likes