His amount of posts on the subject and the way he expressed himself suggests otherwise
1 Like
Relatable
3 Likes
Nah. Gaijin its the wrong here. But that also applied with AESA Eurofighters. That shouldn’t be in game. Su-35s should have be a better option. With 0 controversy whatsoever. Its so rare that they add AESA for Eurofighter that are not ready for the next maybe 5 years. And Su-35s that its like from 2008 is still not in the game. IDK what gaijin its smoking.
Sadly i don’t have time to grind this thing. And for matt video the FM hasnt change that much. The engine its also wrong model. Its also should have the same buff that SM got the last patch.
1 Like
Isn’t it using emergency mode already in game? Thrust would be much less if they based off the 14000 kgf normal thrust instead of how it is game with the 14500 kgf emergency thrust
I have not seen any evidence supporting either side, for both the engines and radar. An Su-30 was tested with the AL-41 and Irbis, but I do not know about the Su-30SM2s in active service.
Them adding the irbis to it with no supporting evidence of it having irbis is funny. Didn’t all the evidence point towards it being an updated more modern bars radar set? The tech mods using the excuse of “there is no evidence it didn’t have it” when there is no evidence that it did is what really puts me off. It’s not as bad as the marketing lie fiasco or the stinger shenanigans but they really need to sort out some consistency when it comes to stuff being implemented.
Quite frankly this should apply to everything in game for all nations if there is no supporting evidence that something did or did not equip something it should not be added to the vehicle otherwise you end up with franken vehicles which should not exist. It’s not the first time or last time this is going to happen tbh I think it needs to be heavily called out or gaijin need to be a lot more transparent with sources and how/why they make these decisions. But after that BVVD video a little while back answering questions I think like it would be talking to a brick wall.
2 Likes
it’s just gaijin doing gaijin stuff to cool smbd’s butt of 30mkm it seems
2 Likes
But they are consistent.
They are consistently inconsistent =]
What its called spool time? the buff that the SM engine got?.. That change was realistic but its not something only affect the AL-31FP engine. Also all Russian engine should have the Emergency Thrust add. This is a game and we don’t care if that dmg the engine. But whatever.
Yea true but for me its rare that they would put AL-41 engine. When 177 engines are much better in all aspect.
cant watch idk why ?
Whatever could you mean?
1 Like
I mostly agree.
What they really need is separate loadouts for rb, sim and custom battles.
RB: anything the vehicle was tested with
SB: the loadout of serial production vehicles
Custom battles: anything the vehicle could be equipped with, even if the nation itself did not purchase that specific weapon.
No one cares about this stuff except the most dedicated of autists
I agree this would be nice but unfortunately this will never happen, and I don’t know if it even should. I’m worried something like this would paralyze their decision making capability with them having to justify every single stat of every vehicle.
In the end, I’m not too worried though. This always happens with new vehicles, and eventually they do get fixed once better info is available.
The R77-1 can be launched outside of gimbal limits, so it can be fired while the SM2 is literally flying away from enemies.
its was about the video but ok nice
Su30sm2 will be better tho
1 Like
it’s genuinely hilarious that the golden eagle will be the same BR as this thing, excellent practical joke by the devs
2 Likes
Everything limited to AIM-120s is inherently dogshit
1 Like