if you dont see why that right there dosent work because of perspective then i dont know what to tell you
1 Like
All I hear is coping and no comparing. Maybe submit your own comparisons if you want to be taken seriously.
They didn’t modeled it yet and i don’t know if they will
i did and all you did was plug your ears and went lalalalala
seems like perspective is forgein to you as well
i have shown multiple things including a statement from the chief designer that it isnt the IRBIS in the Su-30SM2
then there is also this article:
and it says that the Su-30SM2 will have the exact same engiens as the Su-35
but then only said that it will have a better radar than the Su-30SM instead of saying that it will be the same as in the Su-35, like they have done with the engine
1 Like
Was it after they closed a report or something?
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I mean, I feel like Sukhoi would mention something about Irbis for Su-30SM2 in their book…
Plus we know they’re using N011M (or a variant of it) from pictures of production lines.
1 Like
well, this at least can easily be reported with photo evidence.
maybe the Su-30SM2 will get a skin that dosent look like it was abandoned for 15 years
would totally be worth the research
3 Likes
it will get one. It will look like it was abandoned for 20 years instead
1 Like
Toxicity, nice
I’m not trying to prove whether it has the Irbis or not. Simply trying to prove that it has the physical volume capable of holding one.
F-15I was already coming with the same engine and American F-15Es had been using them for 10 years since before the first F-15I was delivered, made no sense to keep one vastly better than the other
1 Like
if the paint is peeling of that just means that it will be lighter resulting in a better flight model
thats why the P-42 didnt have any paint
Man that thing had some mean engines inside. With mean service life as well lmao
the cost you have to pay for a TWR of almost 2
abandoned for probably almost 40 years at this point and stilll loks better than most planes in WT
2 Likes
The black camos for the Flankers is awful…
Still less thrust than AL-41F1 actually. I guess biggest save was removing pretty much all avionics
i mean its still a ~50 year old engine
i would hope that it has less thrust than one that is 10-15 years old