Toxicity, nice
I’m not trying to prove whether it has the Irbis or not. Simply trying to prove that it has the physical volume capable of holding one.
Toxicity, nice
I’m not trying to prove whether it has the Irbis or not. Simply trying to prove that it has the physical volume capable of holding one.
F-15I was already coming with the same engine and American F-15Es had been using them for 10 years since before the first F-15I was delivered, made no sense to keep one vastly better than the other
if the paint is peeling of that just means that it will be lighter resulting in a better flight model
thats why the P-42 didnt have any paint
Man that thing had some mean engines inside. With mean service life as well lmao
the cost you have to pay for a TWR of almost 2
abandoned for probably almost 40 years at this point and stilll loks better than most planes in WT
The black camos for the Flankers is awful…
Still less thrust than AL-41F1 actually. I guess biggest save was removing pretty much all avionics
i mean its still a ~50 year old engine
i would hope that it has less thrust than one that is 10-15 years old
That thing looks like it’s been in the sun for 10 or 20 years or submerged in chlorine, what an ugly, horrible thing, and they don’t even care.
They looked at it and said: Clearly the same.
I’m guessing the standard SM2 camo will be the dark navy one, so washed out basically.
Will be nice to have a black Su-30 in the player statcard.
tf, lmao
somehow updating weapon list and “radio equipment” gives you new engines… sometimes CBRs just straight up ignore report itself or what
they apparently tested them
and thats enough for gaijin look at the british and italian aesa EFs
the ECRS MK.2 wasnt even tested on a eurofighter yet
report has exactly 0 proof of that.
it doesnt say about su-30sm2. can be any random su-30 in the world
It’s mentioned that a testbed is validating use of al41f1s which is probably enough for gaijin
ngl it’s funny how gaijin just wants to add fake stuff