found it, thanks for the name
https://web.archive.org/web/20050313032425/https://www.avitronics.co.za/Airborne/maw300.htm
no
This is my new template for any answer.
Will Su-35 be good?
4 Likes
well no
its heavier than the Su-30SM and has a worse radar and non TVC engines
i personally would go with the Su-35S
No Su-35 had TVC engines. It is either Su-37 or a repurposed airframe for testing.
Oh you cheeky bugger
1 Like
i was talking about the Su-27M
also known as Su-35
Su-35 is also su-35s export name
Su-35 can also be export su-35s
Ye, I know, that’s why I said cheeky.
1 Like
it should have been clear that i was specifically talking about the 27M after saying:
Su-35s is also heavier than su-30sm.
Edit*
Tho not worse radar
but it dosent have a worse radar
1 Like
Fairs
Su-35 technically also isn’t. N011M was tested on one of the airframes that supposed to be a template for serial production
most of them had the N011 (non M) which is a worse radar
Production version would get N011M most likely, unless USSR would want to keep Su-35 downgraded compared to domestic Su-27M
Speaking of 27M, anyone knows difference in lift between Su-27 and Su-30SM in-game? Cuz canards should increase lift for around 15% according to the book kizvy mentioned (or was it 7%? I forgor which one was for lift and which was for surface area)
man i was making a joking reply to your joke
building of the fact that you didnt specify what su35 you mean
1 Like
Canards already make the flankers pull harder, unsure if it’s actually modeled to be a specific 7 or 15 percent