i’ve seen enough
give the rafale 4 more micas it cant perform in this environment when flankers dont become inoperable from a near miss
i’ve seen enough
give the rafale 4 more micas it cant perform in this environment when flankers dont become inoperable from a near miss
Nah bro just give it fully unnerfed mica em and ir and meteors
is MICA really nerfed tho in terms of range?
Yeah. It self destructs at 50km traveled when it should be able to be launched at 100km+.
I mean this ain’t special, amraam A model is also underperforming in range against maneuvering and non maneuvering targets
Pretty much every single missile is underperforming in range tbh.
you have something on that? I could only find between 60 and 80km sources
I can’t find the image on hand (I remember seeing it though) , but here’s the bug report for it. I’ve definitely posted it before but I can’t find it through my history.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/MSBj6oabWaSz
@DirectSupport can probably show it
Something something “marketing lie”
negative 42 degrees celcius, completely unfazed.
Appreciate it
i also found this which could be used to report the ability to toggle the TVC on the Su-30

engine stable operation in supermaneuverability mode
well, right now it is “somewhat toggleable”. If maneuver mode is off - TVC only engages for like half a second when you start to pull and then nozzle goes back to neutral.
Eh, basically no new information from what I can see. The scan and azimuth limits and ACM scan zones are already known from NIIPs website
the ACM zone on the Su-30SM is still wrong ingame tho

Also for irst you have to remember it’s installed at a -7.5 degree angle.
So everything has to be minus -7.5 degrees which is correct already
yes but the overall vertical angle still isnt there
also i completly forgot about that report bc it is 9 months old atp