mmm. I remember something like that on Su-35s Art. on Key Aereo.
well tbf this isnt Russian but for Germans, and is from 2001
You mean comparable acceleration to a Strike Eagle?
Yeah and that’s for the MiG-29 9.12A. I have the same one on my pc
I’d love to have a manual for the SMT or M though or the 27SMx
Heck even manual for the 30MKI would be nice too
2 Likes
I’d believe that for the 35, much less so on the 30SM2 tho.
that isnt the complete one lmao
here is part 2
Yeah I’d belive that too, but then again the thing weighs like 19t iirc?
(The su35 I mean)
yeah, id love to have manuals for post-RMP and post-EPAWSS Strike Eagles, and F-16V’s, but since they are actively in use they kind of dont exist publically
Yeah, about 18,500 kg empty
1 Like
In comparison btw you can get manuals for the F-18A/B/C/D and F-16s from 2006. Still have a hard time finding the unclassified weapons list though
Hmm, makes me wonder what could make the difference in acceleration between the Su-30sm2 and 35 at this point xD
No. What it take to accelerate from 0 to mach speed.
It was one of these “paid” art. Not the forum.
I mean the SM2 is ALOT fatter.
From what we “know”. Both are around 19t. IMO Su-35s data its wrong because it incluye Kibhiny pod and we don’t know what its the 50% fuel for it. But whatever. 300 to 400 Kilos is not a lot of diff.
I keep getting mixed numbers on the su30sm weight, but since in the game it’s above 18.5-ish tonnes, shouldn’t the SM2 and the 35 be kind of close in terms of weight? Given that the su35 empty weight is also high?
That-
No way…
How tf are they gonna make a twin seat the same mass as a single seat.-
1 Like
I still refuse to believe 35 is heavier than a 30SM2 because of hwo much weight a 2nd man adds
The numbers are all over the place seriously
3 Likes
Literally what I was thinking lmao
Then again I read that it might be cause of the extra fuel tanks
1 Like
I’m not sure but that really seems implausible.
But sillier stuff has been done before.