The design is very different from the Su-30 for example, it’s substantially more sleek and streamlined. This is also not the final design, the production variant will be different, mainly to improve its signature.
1 Like
How, exactly?
Not really fair to let the old T-505R represent the Su-57’s production quality
1 Like
Let’s think about what tasks an air-superiority fighter is actually supposed to perform. Then we can also remember the brand-new anti-radiation missile it can carry inside its internal weapon bays.
1 Like
It’s meant as a multirole, not purely a air-superiority fighter. Where did you get this from?
Its a multi-role plane…
Where did you read its a air superiority or a sead plane.
1 Like
Does the magical word “multirole” somehow mean the aircraft is incapable of achieving air superiority?
1 Like
Apparently it just flies Kh-58 missiles from one airbase to another so that other aircraft can mount and use them in SEAD missions.
Incapable ? How so. Just wanna hear you out first.
Source?
There is a difference between a air-superiority fighter and a fighter capable of performing air-superiority. The F-22 can performing bombing missions, does that make it a bomber?
Su-27P only ever real air supiriority fighter ig
You tell me. Because for some reason, it doesn’t.
Wow. Please explain what exactly that difference is supposed to be.
Again, what is the source?
Son… you told us that its incapable. I didnt. Explain yourself.
2 Likes
I’ll give you an example: The F-22 can perform bombing missions. Does that make it the a bomber, the B-22? Same logic
Apparently this is getting difficult. So let’s start with the basics: what exactly is air superiority, and what is its ultimate objective?
Ok, I’ve watched this long enough; I’ll end it here.
Any further discussion of active conflicts will (as has been mentioned often enough) lead to consequences.
Also, put down the verbal insults - even the indirect ones. Such don’t exactly make youself look better at arguing either.
9 Likes
