Russian aviation expert, former designer of the Sukhoi Design Bureau explained why the Su-57 cannot yet be considered a fifth-generation aircraft.
“Fifth-generation aircraft have three key indicators. These are supersonic cruising speed, low visibility, and the unification of all aircraft systems into a single complex. If we compare American aircraft with ours, then ours is not the fifth generation yet. It does not yet meet the low-visibility indicator, it needs to be improved. There are also no standard engines yet that will allow it to match the speed. But the Americans, if we talk about the F-22, then this is a full-fledged fifth-generation aircraft,” he explained. Недопятое поколение. Чего не хватает СУ-57
At the end of April 2018, India withdrew from the joint FGFA (Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft) project with Russia for creation Su 57. The Indian military believes that the Russian Su 57 fighter being created does not meet the stated requirements for stealth. The Indian side also believes that the combat avionics, radars and sensors of Russian development do not meet the standards of a fifth-generation combat aircraft. [Су-57 — Википедия]
definetly a secondary gear on driveshaft broke and they had to drive off on the first one after figuring that it was still possible
yes, it couldn’t be towed. yes it did drive on its own, and unfortunately they probably didn’t have much fun servicing it
I hate to burst your bubble, but the driver accidentally pulled the handbrake and possibly panicked. Then, he managed to figure out what he had done and drove off.
There is a switch for “slope brake”/“parking brake”. The driver panicked, turned it on without noticing. An experienced test driver arrived at the scene, turned it off and then drove it away without any issues.
ah yes redeffect who has been proven false on multiple things earlier
and this also proves another lie; the people running the show said that it was an emergency braking exercise however yall are claiming that it was an accident because the driver panicked
more pro russian lying showing up
watched a m1a2 sepv2 tank commander watch his video and pick apart his nonsense
Did the show organiser say that as soon as it happened or afterwards? Because I’m fairly certain that he interpreted the new drivers mistake as intentional. pretty straightforward.
RedEffects video is from 5 years ago. Even so, the person who made that debunking video, if you read through the comments, is pretty biased and makes some nuanced claims.
the show organizer would know what is planned and what is not planned
yet it proves how redeffect is an unreliable source
still an unreliable source, you dont get to be unreliable and say “okay now i’ve cooled off trust me more bro” and then act like youre a primary source for everything
like i said, the show organizer knows what is planned and what is not. they organize the show, not the drivers.
so, make your pick. you have a false claim or the pro russian show maker has a false claim
well you can’t prove a lie, so for lies there are no reliable sources, only unreliable ones (you get it don’t you?)
this seems somewhat common. pro russians and goverment making up lies but they are different so that they contradict each other which makes them easy to pick apart
also redeffect mentioning no spall liners was proven wrong as you can see here Community Bug Reporting System
