Argument implies you were countering any stated point with any information besides “nuh huh ad hominem”
As I said, how does this even relate to the capabilities of a platform? China is geopolitically stronger than Russia as well. Why are you comparing one of China’s best export jets to the frankly irrelevant MiG-35? Why not use the Su-30 or Su-35 as an example?
his actual argument
your reply:
litterally the defention of a strawman
Because you said Russia failing in modern defense was a stereotype. Your comments are proving that correct.
then why are more countries buying the Su-35 than the J-10
why do you need to compare the sales of the J10 to the Mig-35 thats irrelevant
Because they already bought a lot of weapons that rely on Russian avionics, they were 2nd world countries 40 years ago that bought MiGs and needed similar equipment to “modernize” their air forces. Of course we’re talking about countries like Tajikistan right now so I’m not sure what the point is anyways.
The what coating ?
RAM coating
something that russia even uses on the Su-35S
The coating on the B-2/B-21/F 22/F-15 Stealth Eagle/J-20/J-35/F 35
This has to be baitposting
2 Likes
No. Radar Absorbing Material is not the same as Radar Ablative Coatings
Yeah that should be Absorbant coating what Ablative coating is ?
Russia has had these for a while
The actual name for it lol
so its the same
and its not its name
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1005030223008587
Lmao Russia cannot make the paint domestically. It has been a well known and well documented fact for about a decade that they buy RAC from China. Both countries have stated this
Materials is what something is made of. Coating is what something is coated in. Gnat.
RAM coating
a Radar Absorbant Material coating
last time i checked coatings are mate out of matter or materials
Ah so if I paint concrete then the paint is also concrete. Semantics are pedantic, gnat