sure let me fix this; pro russians*
As an American citizen I am saddened by the fact others are so neck deep in the American propaganda (not to say Russians don’t also operate propaganda) to believe that we are so far ahead of everyone else. Other nations are catching up, that means it’s time to put away the old and ugly things and move onto more modern designs.
As for the original post, it is very informative of the Su-57s capabilities, thank you for sharing.
7 Likes
Then explain how the tank drove off fine
When new Russian things supposedly had technical problems they are trash, when the western F-35 keeps crashing into the ground relentlessly it’s “new things need time to be prefected”
3 Likes
What I said had nothing to do with politics, just the truth. I can say that the driver not knowing how the handbrake works/not knowing where it is is evidence of untrained crews and the Russian cope cover up in the follow up was funny. But the “break down” was like 99% caused by the handbrake.
transmission most likely started on another gear rather than the one which broke. definetly wasn’t handbrake considering the red flag raised for technical difficulties
the tank would never have had stopped and the driver would never have had raised the flag for technical difficulties if there were none.
NGAD (delayed for now sadly) and F/A-XX on the way. Looking forward to the first look at them
1 Like
But that could also mean driver thought there was problems despite it’s just he isn’t very bright
yeah im sure the driver is mentally disabled instead of the tank having issues
Honestly I think ppl should compare to F-22 once it gets it’s upgrades to the Su-57M once it enters production
1 Like
Su-57 is on the left on your word choice, hydrogen bomb is also on the left. You are a pro-russian misinformation media scam disinformation space and threat to democracy. (Above is a funny joke not a serious statement)
4 Likes
They should authorize a Minuteman launch on that post tbh
Post is stored on gaijin servers…
Spare the poor hamster
1 Like
Best named ICBM vs. server hamster
its always the same copes.
Muh F-18 RCS. Muh Engine. Muh Blade. Muh Rivets. I guess YF-23 wasn’t stealth either.
1 Like
look at angle they are taken from. YF-23 photgrapher had to do really specific angle up close. but you can clearly tell that even front on, Su-57 blades exposed
5 Likes
Isn’t one from like the early 90s and the other one from like a few decades later
2 Likes
And? Stealth tech hasn’t change.
1 Like
Hasn’t changed hmm
Has your phone changed since the 90s?
5 Likes
couldnt catch a fish with a commerical trawler with that bait
2 Likes
You must have just been born yesterday, huh?
1 Like