Su-57's radar suite is actually better, F-22 is ageing badly. [Not Ragebait]

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

1 Like

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

1 Like

How utterly impressive – Russian radars are so technologically backward compared to Chinese ones: heavier, shorter detection range , and laughably low integration. J11B They even require counterweights when installed, otherwise the aircraft balance goes haywire!(‌1-ton counterweights) Such a brilliant showcase of their primitive electronics industry.with that ‌0.5m² radar signature‌, the SU-57 makes the F-22’s ‌0.0001m²‌ stealth look like … oh, and let’s not forget their complete absence of stealth coatings. Truly world-class!

3 Likes

What Does this even mean. better in what way?

it being heavier?

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

Didn’t he make it clear? Russian radar is low in integration and technology.

you are talking about the N001 but sure, an 80s radar

their more modern radars dont even weigh 1 ton and in the case of the Irbis-E not even half a ton

thats just not true

but you can prove me wrong by just providing a source for that claim, right?

1 Like

sure their 50 year old radar from the 80s

he was talking about the J-11B means that they swapped out the N001

and it is pretty unfair to compare a radar from the 80s with one from at least 2000

a fairer comparison would be the BARS which the Su-30MKI got in the late 90s/ early 2000

3 Likes

Can Chinese player stop humiliating themselves?.

2 Likes

Su35 literally has stealth coatings for sure, why wouldn’t su-57 have them too. I can understand some of the t-50s not having it, but actual production ones?

2 Likes

afaik, RCS in game is exactly the planes wingspan

Stealth jets like F-117 have multipliers over that value for its reduced rcs in game, for various angles.

they cant be tho, barely any overlap, side radars are mostly meant for beaming maneouvres and larger scan area

Looking on stuff on it, it probably can act as FCS in the following ways

some patents on it

http://www.niimp.ru/files/library/Radiotechnology.pdf
http://www.niimp.ru/files/library/Opit%20razrabotki%20i%20osvoeniya%20v%20proisvodstve.pdf
http://www.niimp.ru/files/library/GaN%20L-band.pdf
http://jre.cplire.ru/jre/library/3conference/pdffiles/a005.pdf
САМОЛЕТНАЯ АНТЕННАЯ РЕШЕТКА. Патент № RU 2453955 МПК H01Q21/00 | Биржа патентов - Московский инновационный кластер
http://www.niimp.ru/files/library/Radiotechnology.pdf

http://jre.cplire.ru/jre/library/3conference/pdffiles/a005.pdf

Low TRM count, but extremely powerfull TRM upto 1.2kw per TRM, that to GaN

Just like you?

Where did he humiliate himself?

3 Likes

What a wonderfull conversation on su57 and f22

It started off interesting and I came away with some interesting factoids but as per usual its devolved into excrement flinging for the most part.