So what you’re saying is that neither of us know 100%. Got it.
And RedEffect, again wasn’t lying at ALL. His claims were based on lack of experience, treating tanks like they had stats in a MMORPG game or smth and not talking to actual tankers. Again, its been 5 years and he is quite reputable now. IF you decide not to trust him, then nothing I can say or do will change that. Simple.
Sure,
what i’m saying is very likely, supported by above mentioned factors and is logical. what you’re saying is illogical, impossible, and contradicts what the people running the show are saying.
think it like this; neither of us had a trip inside the moon, we both have claims about what the core is made of.
you say that the core is made of something illogical, improbable and virtually impossible, like cheese
i say that the core is made of metal, citing logical reasoning, actual possibilities and other analyzed information
however you think that our claims are equal, that both of us know nothing.
like i said, and what i will cite here again;
now i will take a shower and move on with life, feel free to add more cope text below. ill read it later on.
Organizers do know what will happen during a military parade. Rehearsals exist for a reason.
No one will tell you for sure, it was introduced a long time ago in 2009 (it was developed even earlier), as an onboard multifunctional interrogator with AESA…
Features and application possibilities… Assessing the Tikhomirov NIIP L-Band Active Electronically Steered Array
The problem with these forums and the people commenting on them is that the vast majority act as if they have any real understanding when, in reality, they are entirely ignorant in the literal sense of the word. They disregard readily available information on the topic and instead mindlessly repeat outdated misconceptions or outright propaganda that aligns with their bias, even when those claims have been debunked repeatedly.
Take, for example, the absurd claim that the Su-57 lacks an S-duct an assertion that is demonstrably false. These people fixate on whatever supports their preconceived notions, often comparing it to the F-22 and assuming that stealth design must follow identical principles. But where did they read, or what source did they provide, to support the claim that an S-duct must completely obscure the compressor face from all angles ? Your guess is as good as mine.
In reality, the YF-23’s compressor is visible in the frontal aspect, yet no one questions its stealth credentials on the contrary, American sources rate it as even stealthier than the F-22. Likewise, the Su-57 production unit showcases a very similar S-duct design and furthermore employs radar blockers on both the inlet and exhaust sides of the engine. But when confronted with this contradiction does that mean the YF-23 isn’t stealthy? They resort to convoluted mental gymnastics rather than admitting their ignorance.
That is the harsh reality and the reason why many of the knowledgeable members have stopped engaging with the community. Discussion is pointless with these people as they do not seek to learn !
A jet from the 90’s still dominating is crazy work.
Dominating in propaganda value for sure but as far as real life combat value goes , lackluster empirical evidence to say the least !
wasn’t this concluded as fake?
edit; yes it was.
Beware of fighter pilots bearing gifts | Lowy Institute is one for mentioning it
do love the constant pro russian misinformation here though
Posting a random articule. To disprove Fighter_bomber. You can’t post a better copium than that.
“random articulate” that is unfortunately for you very correct. you can verify the articles information at knaapo.ru
Most Russian military page are down or for me can’t be access. And Knaapo its now Knaaz.
don’t tell me you don’t know how to use web archive…
https://web.archive.org/web/20160604035120/http://www.knaapo.ru/products/su-35/
Viktor Sumerin, NII PP deputy general designer: “In addition, our system has high-level calculation unit. As a part, there are three CPUs of the Pentium4 level. They help to analyze the picture, allow system to work in overview mode, detect targets on long distances and on the sun-lighted clouds background.”
I might be wrong btu that Overview mode. Its the video thing. You’re trying to disprove.
yes and most likely what he was talking about was the non physical situation “picture” generated by the array rather than IIR sensor. Looking at the qualities of the IRST it has all disadvantanges a non imaging irst would have while having no qualities of an IIR sensor.
now considering the topic is still su-57 what people don’t know about the inlet is that the visible “thing” here is a radar blocker
while it isn’t as good as any s duct it isn’t the bare motor either
the radar blocker is before the engine and is coated with RAM (or so i believe, don’t see any restrictions for it)
a lot of people say that it is the engine fan theyre wrong
and with s duct inlet, the su57 has one however it doesn’t cover the engines fully
before people call it useless, the super hornet uses the same system. if it were useless, why would it be used on the super hornet too?
What are you talking about?.What is the difference between a television image from an analog television camera and a television image that is created (transmitting an array of data) by SOLID-state MATRIX
PHOTO CONVERTERS… Инфракрасная фотография — Википедия
The OLS-35 has a TV+IR mode(video images)…
thanks for proving me correct that it uses ccd+non imaging ir and the irst is not IIR
if you understand cameras you understand that the link you gave me is not imaging infrared or anything to do with heat. You can do this by adding a filter to your visible light camera.
No one uses direct recording of infrared radiation right now…All fighter aircraft in the world use a similar technology…
He’s talking about the first parade where it was showed off, which clearly shows the vehicles handbrake engaged. (Anyone with a vehicle should know how handbrakes function) Also the vehicle wasn’t towed off and drove off on its own.
There’s still a lot of classified information about the f-22 but the block 30/35 supposedly added side looking Aesa radars as well, plus block 5 onward use an improved AN/APG-77(V)1, so it doesn’t lose that badly in situational awareness, and the rest like EW will always be classified and won’t be fully modeled in WT anyway.
The Su-57 will for sure be more maneuverable but should still lose in kinematics and Supercruise.
I can’t wait until j-20 comes and probably blow both the f22 and su57 out of the water with the ws-15 engines, 360 tons of thrust and 2-3 tons lighter than f22 and su57.
f35 eodas has IIR
eurofighter pirate IRST uses IIR and can track 500 targets at once
su35 non IIR irst can only track 4 targets at once
you get the point dont you
