It has thermal built-in.
i was waiting for TGP on Su-34 for one reason
using Laser guided missiles and bombs
namely Kh-29L and Kh-38ML and such
for Kh-29L, you can get within 10km launch it and turn back
as for Kh-38ML, you can do the same thing but from far far away…
pretty much making even a pantsir hopeless to kill the plane, and only target its AGMs which is un-rewarding
Bro nobody likes playing top tier ground unless your Germany and USA and Sweden are on your team.
What’s powerful about is it’s guidance modes.
It can be ripple fired off at 300ft and it will fly over the battlefield looking for targets. They will then communicate with each other so that they will all hit a different target before using an mmV seeker to pick the weakspot on the target and hit.
12 to 18 tanks destroyed and the tornado never had to expose themselves above treetop level.
In game… They are modeled to be hellfire missiles. they only have a laser seeker. They lack range. Etc etc.
Gaijin is butchering the Brimstone because they can and because it’s British.
1 Like
And no one wants Russian crap on our tree. It sucks that British tech is being replaced by soviet stuff
1 Like
Dude you complain about anything Russian. We had a whole discussion already about the A-10C and it’s br. Su-34 being 12.7 seems fair if the A-10C is still merely 11.7
You even post how your annoyed the Brit’s didn’t get some X weapon. This isn’t the topic for that. You should be asking for a better aa if anything.
1 Like
Ah yes, the Brit’s suffer. (Not) different play styles for sure. But nothing suffers like poor old italy
1 Like
So… your asking gaijin to remove your better T90 in the Brit tree?
May I remind you in terms of air combatants, the harriers are extremely good in turn fights, boast high Cms, and high amount of AAMs typically?
Su-34 is 13.3 and should be 13.7 in air. Simple. Insane something with 8x R-77 and a PESA radar isn’t.
Also… Su-34 has 100x the A2G fire power and A-10C has. It’s funny that you still think an A-10C is a “good” aircraft in GRB
1 Like
Yes, please get rid of the T-90
Harriers only have good turn rates at low air speeds.
They have high CMs count on the Gr7 and FA2 only and due to BOL. BOL is modeled wrong and is underperforming by at least 75% if not more. It’s incredibly weak.
Also their heat sigs are wrong due to high thrust from how they bodged the hover working. Meaning flaring anything is far harder than it should be
They don’t have high AAM counts. The average is 4 missiles. Gr7 is actually missing the ability to take 6x AAMs
2 Likes
Then let’s give the Su-34 and Su-25SM3 Vikhrs only. It’s a different play style for sure but just a skill issue if you cant survive to hit something with them. Soviets don’t need KH-38s
1 Like
Dude refusing the MKI is like refusing a hot Spanish Latina to a dance and an after party. Personally i would not do that.
1 Like
Why do I want an Su-30 C&P when we have the Typhoon. The best looking aircraft ever made
1 Like
Two is better than one.
Platan has FLIR ?
Anyhow SIM will be one sided battles as during the Vikhr era. No wonder that players hates large open maps when GJ allows such weapons with very limited counter.
Platan doesn’t. Only the Kh-38MT’s do.
The Su-34 and Su-25SM3 can’t use Vikhrs
Then laser guided KH-29s only then
Or they stay how they are.
2 Likes
If Britain complaing about Brimstones is a skill issue, then Su-34s should be fine with similar weapons then and don’t need FnF missiles
1 Like