Su-33

Dev Server "Leviathans" General Discussion - Dev Server
61

Yes. I’m aware. I already posted this. Also according to a person whom I’ve asked who knows lots of stuff about Russian stuff, this seeker cone wouldn’t even make sense. It can’t angle the seeker, and if it did get a proper cone, it would be similar to the R-77 or a R-27ER. The pointy head should also be a dummy missile.

And it would make sense having a dummy missile in display or in display during flying. You can clearly see the other missiles not being real as their boosters are literally covered/filled (seen in the photos where a “R-27EA”, which is a dummy because of the pointy seeker, is being flown)

There is literally no proof of a test launch aside from the R-27A. And the configuration where it is “displayed” doesnt even make sense either. If it were made, documents would’ve already surfaced just like the R-27A

1 Like
62

Yep

63

Going off of Yefim’s book, unless you mean the proposed T-10MK, Su-33"M" first of all isn’t a real name but they associate it with the proposed refurbishment/MLU package by KnAPPO, which mainly includes L-150, a Satelite Navigation Suite and AL-31FM1s. No upgrade to it’s radar or FCS mentioned…

64

This is what i was refering to although it would have recieved the ability to fire the R-77’s too (my main proof to this is a pic i can’t find anymore of the 27KUB having an R-77 mounted so take it with a big pinch of salt)

65

T-10KUB-1 used Zhuk-M/N010M, completely different radar compared to N001K.

66

I’m aware, do take this with a big pinch of salt

67

No. I doubt r27ea will ever come to the game

1 Like
68

No we should let them pick, we simply increase the quantity in unison.