You’re so right. You should be head of the department of war and all of the research and development that goes on. How could they totally forget to consult you on the future of air superiority smh
Different missile project
Thrust Vectoring on a BVRAAM 🤔
Criticising a delayed and flawed project earns kind of this response does it?
Its supposed to be derived from the aim9x’s thrust vectoring capabilities. and the info from the MM seeker project was supposedly fed directly into aim260s testing.
1 Like
What response? I’m stating a fact. You should be head of the department of war. The R&D department needs your expertise. Maybe you can educate them based off your war thunder knowledge :)
Idk it seems impractical at best, i’d understand if they were trying to replace the Aim-9 series with a multipurpose ARH missile.
But putting TVC on a supposedly long range missile doesn’t achieve anything unless it’s meant to fill in for the lack of frontal control surfaces
1 Like
Tbf that i think is what they’re doing for the new F22s. it seems they want them to be able to hold 8 aim260 since it will likely be just an all around better missile than the aim9/aim120. Though once again this is just rumors.
Well i appreciate the compliment, but if you’re going to defer straight to the childish ‘beat around the bush’ approach because I am not confident in the DoD’s ability to manufacture a new missile in the timespan that it would be relevant
Also i think this is sorta correct. same way the aim9x works.
1 Like
What’s childish about my comment? I’m being genuine. You seem to know what you’re talking about. The department of war needs your confidence and consultation.
aim260 may enter service before we get 5th gens in wt.
You are underestimating the french bug reporters, they got the MICA buffed in the first place, it will happen again.
This time at least the meteor will be on more than one platform tho.
2 Likes