What better engines could it possibly get??
Issue is that there are no upgraded engines
Gaijin could upgrade Su-30SM to the SM2, just like how Su-27SM got the double pylons from Su-27SM2
Not from Su-27SM2, but from Su-35S.
Gaijin: SOLD SOLD SOLD
As did the Su-30SM and the Kh-38 with it witch is a buff already that we have no proof of them using
Not sure that KH-38MT was spotted on Su-35s
Yea that’s kinda nuts, Su-30SM shouldn’t have gotten the Kh-38MT’s, Kh-29TD’s were more than enough already to make it a competent CAS
There a Photo of an Su-35S (Red 24) carrying 2 Kh-38 on stations 9 and 10 missiles for testing
The pylons are something that can be used on any platform carrying underfuselage R-77s, though the Su-30SM2 is an entirely different aircraft.
If you’d like to implement the 4th most advanced radar in the world just because 125kN per engine isn’t enough power to you, have fun embarrassing yourself.
Su-30SM has no upgraded engine options. SM2 has an intent to use the new variant of the thrust vectoring Saturn engine, but that’s it.
F-15C also goes mach 2 and maintains it while turning.
Its Strongest Rocket on real distance battle… Statshark in help.
Its Big Countermeasure its x2 from normal 96x2=192
And so?
SU-30SM on dev now its strongest plane with Rafale.
He dont need Buffs.
Bruh…
no, just have tvc on a toggle
Nah bro… the 30sm very good plane. Just the CM count and the engine thrust incorrect.
Correct CM count is 192 and the correct engine thrust 25.000kgf so 2x 12.500 with max burner.
All page says same thing… 12.500 the correct at this engine


CM amount is correct. You always can count amount of CM on plane.
Thrust is also correct, 12500kgf is without channel losses, so, right.
Read my reply above.
Oh boy, a DEFINITELY trustworthy blogspot that can’t tell the difference between Saturn and Lyulka, let alone an AL-41F and AL-41F-1S!
Especially when they quote someone’s statement from 2022… Directed towards the development of the SM2, which they mentioned multiple times.
You didn’t reply to anything, you linked a blog site that incessantly takes things out of context for the sake of making an article.