Yeah it should be 13.7. decompression of the Br is also a problem to be solved.
RVV-AE needs a higher BR, period.
As do many Russian jets with tech beyond what US can have.
All-aspect Russian missiles vs rear-aspect US missiles tells you enough.
US IR missiles are flat out better overall vs their Russian equivalent
AIM-9L vs R-60
AIM-9M vs R-73
what tech? Do you mean GNSS?
Full AESA radar?
1 Like
The guy is in complete denial and totally hysterical because he’s exploiting the current situation with the Su-30.
I feel like you, me, and the other people in this thread are talking to a brick wall.
That guy knows the Su-30 is completely broken and utterly detrimental to the game in its current state.
He’s just a typical “wallet warrior” and power abuser trying to compensate for his in-game frustration with money.
2 Likes
Do you know what gaijin coins are ?
So the mistake of the dev is on me ? Sure bud
That’s why I said it should go up. Can you read ?
aim9m isn’t better than r73 though, it’s only really better for the irccm and the r73 isn’t bad, aam3 I would put above it though.
It is better
seeker shutoff IRCCM is superior in most air rb scenarios since it’s less situational
AIM-9M also has better energy retention which ends up giving it more range
1 Like
the range isn’t going to matter just fire it a second or two later, aim9m range is overstated for it’s drag too, gate vs narrowing is situational not just better, r73/pl8/magic are better from rear aspect while aim9m/aam3 are better for side or front, aim9m has horrible agility you can just out pull the missile a lot of times vs something like the aam3/magic/r73. it’s a good missile but I think the r73 is better as it’s not your primary weapon it’s used for close engagements.
Side aspect you’ll get significantly more often than rear-aspect
and gate narrowing needs to be up close to actually be good
Worse pull isn’t a significant downside here since 90% of your launches are from 3-4km
if you’re fireing a fox2 in fox3/1 range sure the aim9m might be better, but you’re probably going to be using it in a close range engagement in which maneuverability and comparable range are superior, the aim9m doesn’t possess a significant range advantage over the r73, the only advantage is irccm
Most of the time you won’t get that scenario where the better dogfighting capability of the R-73 would really come into play
Would love for a Gaijin rep to inform us all of what merits the C.10 has other than FOX-3s that make it on par with the Su-30MKK and MK2
1 Like
Hurr AESA Radar, HMD durr
IT HAS AESA??? Been playing that thing since release and never knew ;-;
Also the 30s have hmd :P
HMS, not HMD
You would notice the difference once you played sim
😭 son
Just hopped into a sim test drive… yeah i see what you mean. Doesn’t explain the same br in ARB thing though
gaijin doesn’t care if a post gets 10k likes they wont change it because the forums is not where players should go to get something changed
it’s an HMD that displays tons of information like altitude, speed, target range and firing symbology.
what’s the line between HMS and HMD anyway? is HMS orange and HMD green?
1 Like
June and July stats for most games I wouldn’t say more people own the su30s I think more people just play more games in su30s as we can see all the premiums are around 50% winrate and another reason why f-18s the mig23 and the f-4 have worse K/D is because newer players don’t do air to air much the bring naplam for ez bases su30s on the other hand get fire and forgets so its much easier to get air to air but for some reason F18 owners and f4 owners go head on the target waiting for aim7 to hit instead of turning away and keeping lock a HMD is much more beginner friendly too