What?
There are a few at 170°, a few at 140°, F14 if that counts 130° I think, lowest is 120°. It’s literally impossible for it to be “average”
50x10° is massively overkill for most application where you want to track one target without going full tunnel-vision and setting off alarm bells in targets aircraft (STT).
I also explained why 4 bar is the worst one in the game:
I do
There is. Like I said earlier ‘when you want to track one target without going full tunnel-vision on them and setting off alarm bells in targets aircraft (STT)’. Soft-locking also allows you to launch Fox 3’s, it also ensures target stays within the same bar at all times for consistent refreshes. Something 4-bar radars with current patterns MASSIVELY punishes you for missing (up-to 14 second reacquisition time like me and UD explained), it also means you can crank, gain/drop altitude however you want without target drifting out of the scan-zone or losing track.
Read what I wrote again… Slowly…
Also, I have 93 games in the flanker in EC simulator games. A game mode where you actually rely on your avionics and don’t have the entire enemy team marked in red text 3 minutes into the game to point-and-click at with HMS. I also have ~4x more kills just in sim alone compared to you in all modes with same number of games.
You’re the one saying the radar is ‘VERY’ good and tunable with one of the best user-interactive integrations, and that it has the most information feedback when it’s objectively the worst radar in those exact areas. Also press the simulator tab
6 Likes
also if you haven’t noticed, this is a sim thread. easy mistake though.
4 Likes
Yeah, we’ve been talking about sim this entire time… Have we not been?
I think he’s pointing it out because you accuse him of being bad in the Su-27 in spite of basically having not played it yourself in Sim.
I think it’s hilarious that a player with less than 5 games is claiming that everyone that has issues with the Su-27 radar has skill issues.
2 Likes
A few at 170? Such as what? To my knowledge only the MiG-29 9-19 has that.
It most definitely is average… It has the same azimuth as the APG-66, APG-68, APG-63, the Foxhunter 3G, the JL-10, the KLJ-7, EVERY Thompson / Thales radar (5 vehicles), the cyrano, the PS-46, and… Yeah, I think it’s pretty on-par with its opposition.
And as I had said, what purpose would that serve?
I’m not sure if you lost the topic, or simply forgot where you are, but the Su-27 doesn’t carry ARH missiles.
Ah, yes, I do indeed enjoy going out of my way to put myself at a disadvantage using a mode that’s FAR worse than HMD, as well as hasn’t gotten its range tweaked.
Explain to me again why you would ever use ACM?
Congratulations, I couldn’t care less.
I haven’t played realistic or sim since I’ve spaded either of my Su-27s, since then I’ve pushed about 9-10 flight hours in customs with dogfights and screwing around with BVR, plus a handful of tourneys.
Of course somebody with 1/7th my match count and a fraction of my custom clock would immediately point to sim stats… Especially trying to use it to attack somebody who doesn’t play it because of the exact issue noted in this post.
Not sure what you’re talking about with “all modes”, though… You’re 3/2 in the same aircraft that I’ve pushed a 2.4kd in.
Yes, it is. You have a myriad of options of detecting an enemy, as well as 2 PRF modes.
You have a TSD with radar integration in your HUD… How is that not one of the most informative systems in the game? Arguably the only vehicle that comes close would be the A-10C, and if not that then the Mirage 2000-5F with its high vis HDD.
What would the simulator tab tell me?
I never once accused him of being bad in the Su-27, and I play the Su-27 almost exclusively in sim.
Again, refer to custom time. I have more than both of you combined, as well as an exclusive title earned expressly by flying the Su-27 in full-real.
What title is that?
Holy hell, for a couple of stat munchers you guys sure do struggle to read.
1v1 Duelist isn’t a title you get for flying the Su-27 in full real controls if that is what you are implying.
Also time slinging missiles in AfricaMod is not the same as playing sim.
3 Likes
Yes, it is. Unless you mean to tell me that I wasn’t going through the WoP bracket with an Su-27.
I’m sure it isn’t… That’s more than likely why you’d lose.
Not sure why you decided to go with Africa, though, he has quite possibly the SHITTIEST server of them all.
Just host your own.
But yeah, sure, keep up the elitism. You’re DEFINITELY better because you prefer less technical missile-slinging than dogfights and 1v1/2v2s.
Lmao.
I’m pretty sure if we did F-15A vs Su-27 that I would win. Even if we did same plane duels I would probably win. And I don’t even play tournaments.
But that is really beside the point of the thread.
Also this is a lie.
1 Like
Ah yes, because that’s definitely a fair fight.
What else, a maneuverability contest between the King George V and a corvette?
I’m sure you would. Feel free to invite me whenever.
That isn’t accusing him of being bad?
That’s saying that his statement of
Was indicative of him not playing the aircraft recently. He cleared that up quite well by showing me the ACM mode, while i was under the impression he was mentioning the HMD.
Careful man, your 'tism is showing. Not all of us were blessed with general understanding of a language / social cues.
Can you tell me what the very next word is in that quote of mine lmfao
2 Likes
ACM, which I had thought was out of the question as going out of your way to use ACM is quite idiotic.
If thats not a fair fight, should the Su-27 go to 12.7 then? 😂
Why would it?
b
Because you wrote that its an unfair fight. So if the F15-A is stronger, the Su-27 has to go to 12.7 by that logic…
I sent you an invite.
Yes, because one has near limitless nose authority while the other is a flying brick with little to no turn capability.
Why would the Su-27 be lowered if it’s a far better BFM fighter?