
yes, the audio was made with AI, not the information used
And the only source listed is this:
https://www.fmv.se/aktuellt--press/aktuella-handelser/forsta-stridsvagn-123a-i-sverige/
Which doesn’t state:
which is in the video.

not like the source shows this as well, and again he is in contact with knds as well
the AI things was purely cause he did input his script and had his own voice AI generated trough his video library to save on time, seems like the first time he tried that feature
Two videos prior:

The auto dub is it’s own category.
once again, i did not say auto dubbed
auto dub is a different from voice generation from text, if you actualy listen you hear the difference between his normal german and the ai german
You are way to stuck on the AI thing
This vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOFTx9NP3y4
and this vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaCBtzlodC8
Sound about the same to me, one has the AI tag and the other doesn’t, both auto dubbed.
Yes, because it matters a lot (at least to me and i would argue it should to others as well).
( AI Search Has a Citation Problem - Columbia Journalism Review )
Pretty sure that photo there is only about 123A not anything to do with B
dont think so as a native, there is many in the comments complaining about the AI voicing as well
it depends on the use case of generative AI, besides that your study specialy talks about generative search tools.
Creation of information and pictures is bad yes, but not voicing onesown voice.
Counter question, did sweden at one point even talk about APS systems on their leopard yet , that they want to get them?
talks about the strv123 systen as a whole, thats why simulator, ammunition etc is named,
But aps suprisingly not
I’m not disagreeing with this :P
I’m concerned that the content itself has been AI generated, there is nothing stating otherwise anywhere. I honestly can’t find any good solid info for the credibility of that youtuber or their sources. At least not on first cursory search.
Not sure actually. I’ll do some digging. :)
Because it’s most likely focused on 123A lmao and not the 123s as a whole
Can’t find anything currently, will dig more when i have more time :)
if you look closely at the 2 shown tanks you will notice the differences
Both have L/55
Rightside has the add on frontal camera
french galix smoke launcher system kept from remodell
Leftside
No add on frontal camera solution, likely integrated into the newly built hull
No french galix system, moving away and adapting new system
Those are 2 major model changes hard to explain if they both are a A version.
If it would be the strv122a, there would still be wrongly modelled changes
Interesting quote i found just now:
i am aware of that one.
But its mostly cause sweden is one of the biggest users and specialy a milestone user with having integrated the tvm solution as the first user


