One of the best in game since it has 90° gimbal, i would ignore that user since he has been spewing bad takes all afternoon
Yeah that bothered me too much, i mean getting 6 spikes and 1000Hp engine is quite nice but Sweden never used 30MM Bushmaster on their CV90’s, if anything it should be fixed with bug report.
Id still do it
I’ll see if I can write a report on it at some point, it’ll take me a bit tho.
Nice book, too bad no evidence supports that
New HMD look really cool. I Wonder what they have done to them.
I mean the british FGR4 had brimston integration before the blk15 im pretty sure but it was brimstone 2s not ones hmm
Ill do the gun if you wanna get the APS
If there is evidence, rest assured that you don’t know how to read is something else.
“Strike potential” Im assuming that is referring to A2G not A2A
@Smin1080p_WT Sooooo… Does the Su-33 goes straight up to the R27ER? Does this mean it will be armed with these as stock?
Same when Su-30MKI
We might want a thread up on it once the dev section goes live.
I’ll try get a report in on APS, once the bug report section lets me in.
Don’t tell me or others to ignore others.
Not only is it disgusting to request/demand, it’s going to make me read their posts more. No one is worth that disrespect. Even my worst “enemies” deserve to have their posts taken seriously by me.
Search rate with a narrow search mode is what I care about most in my TWS radars personally.
It’s a paragraph in a book, with no citation or linked source, in a pragmatic sense the words are meaningless
Ok so I’m looking at fm charts and rn the EF bends over everything while the ralph is a slightly worse adf fm
Your choice then
say it with me boys.
just because a book says it doesnt make it true.
Please keep the thread on rails. Quite a few of you are going off-topic.