It’s not a new “take”. These standards have already been in the game for some time going all the way back to the F-104S, F-4F and others.
If a vehicle has a technical possibility to mount something, it’s open to consideration by the Devs. Ultimately they decide on game balance. So long as it can be proven that it’s possible.
Hi, I have 2 questions at once. How are things with the cas for the F15Raam, and one more. Is it possible to find out why the new CV (from Sweden) carries 2 more spikes than the new Namer, although they have identical launchers and a tubular charging principle?
is it possible that if indegenous israeli cas armaents wont be given this updade could a temporaray solution be to give us atleast agm 65s? it would reaaly help thank you
Hi Smin,
Has the air-to-ground ordnance for Chinese aircraft such as J-10A, JF-17, JH-7A been under Gaijin’s radar?
There have been many bug reports that specify that they can either take more ordnance that we have ingame on more pylons, or they have other options such as AGMs that can be added.
There are no documents for the new Namer, it hasn’t even entered service. It has a tube loading, you can carry as many tubes as you put in the compartment at the back. But for some reason Freccia has 10 spikes, CV has 6, and only Namer has 4.