You said “AIM-9M is AIM-9L/I, but with smokeless motor”
bruh
You dont want leaks on submarines, or like, any ships lol.
Oh, Gorlan heights open for Ground RB 12.0? Great.
Attack the D point!
yes, because AIM-9M has smokeless motor
No one needed a PESA when no one else could get it but that didn’t stop them from adding the su34. And I think there are other jets that could get an AESA at the same time. Should all come with the F-2 though
Idk man, ship do pour out waters of little holes above the waterline :)
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
How about the boeing 757 they tested the APG-77 with lol
For real? it only show RBE02 on the dev right now.
esa radars are being dished out to aircraft with a distinct disadvantage compared to its peers, fullback is miles behind the F-15E so it can have a PESA, Rafale is stuck with MICAs for the forseeable future and needs a PESA to compensate
Not really when they needed to make changes to the turret to fit the 30 mm version for the czech
@ExecutivOutcomes Please don’t quote people and change their original text to say something different
Mr. Bulannikov said on a Russian stream that he has an AESA radar, but they are still working on it
I won’t take BVVD’s words cause they could decide that it is a bit ahead of their schedule and delete it.
Supposedly it will be changed. Who fucking knows tho.
Tbh the rafale probably has the worst aesa radar on any modern fighter, so even a 63v2 could outperform it
Simply and factually false
Question! How do the German, British and Italian Eurofighters compare in the air-to-air department?
So far, all I’ve caught is;
German has:
-No IRST.
-AIM-9L/I instead of AIM-9M.
Anything else I am missing, or is the German one just the “worse” of the bunch?
Why BVVD?
“Worse” in that being kneecapped is worse than losing a few fingers, sure.
IRST will have minimal effect, on account of being stuck with 9Ms or 9M equivalents. Only difference with the L/I is the smoke, which only really matters in sim.