Storm Warning - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

a nation with a 2A7 in their ground tree can’t claim “suffering” lmao.

2 Likes

The Su-30SM and J-10B/J-11B I’m assuming will come next update, bringing that number up to eight.

The air tree was.

6 Likes

Its 7.7…It could never have its realistic rate of fire andf not be totally cracked.

should be pretty fun! I might run 4 derby and play it like the YAK141, especially good if the AESA Radar is modelled correctly!

It didn’t have to be 7.7 though…

Hello sweet Columbia !

1 Like

Vidar is 8.0 with the 6 second reload + thermals + 50.cal + better mobility + better armor compared to the pzh2000

pzh2000 either needs to move down or a few other sphs need to move up with the vidar going to 8.3 or 8.7

6 Likes

Type 99 SPH is 7.3 with a 7.5 second reload

1 Like

It didnt, but derp guns lose their effectiveness pretty quickly.
Give it the reload rate and whack it to 11.7

And F-2 hopefully

in what world is a 4.5 - 5 second reload 11.7 worthy?

1 Like

Interesting. Should be able to carry 4 Derby irl, can’t check how it is ingame rn.

scan speed now is slow, hope they fix it

its also get very good pod
image

image

I have an issue with derp guns the PZH 2000, VIDAR and M109s are too strong for WW2 tanks they face
But they are too weak to play at the top tier.

4.5 second realod on the PZH 2000 would allow it to 1 tap everything at the 7.7-8.0 BR bracket

1 Like

Yo, what is up with Rafale AESA? currently it looks like it is worse than Su-34 PESA since it acts just like any other mechanical radar and not ESA at all

Yes.

1 Like

6 second would be enough like it was on the devserver at 7.7. The vidar should go up to 8.3 considering it is stronger than the pzh2000 even with similar reload (mostly due to the thermals at this low br)

2 Likes

Vidar has always been dumb, derp guns with LRF are so strong vs ww2 tanks. I didnt play the dev server if that was the reload rate it should have been carried accross.

1 Like