It seems like Ground has taken a backseat, while the last few updates seem to be revolving around Air.
Not surprised though.
2 Likes
Been like that for the whole year.
A depressing update to end a depressing year for ground.
On the bright side there will be some SAM stuff next year so ground will have that going for it. But I do think there’s still many aircraft yet to add compared to top tier ground so there will be some air focus for a little bit longer
3 Likes
We don’t talk about the F-16 derivative with a domestically-produced AESA radar.
The SAM buff will expose the significant balance issues between nations MBT wise, so I’m hopeful that Gaijin will also fix those issues when the SAM buffs cause the 2A7s/122s to stomp even harder again.
Out of curiosity, why don’t you like RDF/LT?
1 Like
Instead of spending the time and resources on something that would help top tier US winrates, they spent them on something that will actively make them even worse. Which will also hurt top tier British and Israeli winrates by proxy due to matchmaker.
Even if they added it to the tech tree, it wouldn’t have done anything to help top tier US winrates.
It’s a light tank that is less mobile than most MBTs at it’s BR without the firepower to help it.
3 Likes
You think so? I do think it will nerf air power a bit but even then, it’s just a matter of who keeps spawning. I notice it’s not that for example, it’s not that the US teams have inferior tanks, but that they don’t have a lineup
1 Like
The 2A7/122 are absolutely miles above every other tank in game, including the Abrams lol.
Currently the US, UK, Israel, France, China and Russia mostly use their more oppressive CAS to fight back because their MBTs are seriously outclassed. Now with the new SAM buffs CAS would be mostly kept in check/equalized, while the massive gap between the 2A7/122 and every other MBT remains.
Smin confirmed Indian copy pastes as a sub tree before China had this many Pakistani vehicles in the tree
bro… Smin already confirmed more than 10 times after the Bison devblog
3 Likes
Yeah same I have too for the … I think yall get the point lmfao
2 Likes
I’m more knowledged of Japanese interwar and early WWII vehicles…🤓
3 Likes
Fair, probably a Maus or Fireraid question then maybe even AAM-3 since he made the suggestion thread
no it wouldnt. the f16D tested them irl and theres photographic evidence ,in no way should the derbys be removed
Remove the derby, replace it with python 5.
You’re right, it’s not airintercept radar ping
Yes, it would.
That is completely irrelevant.
Firstly, the evidence of F16D in IAF service using Derby is pretty solid, secondly, there is a crucial difference between the combat efficiency of a Fox 3 based BVR system and visual range combat systems like the python 5, and it makes no sense depriving the F16D of a crucial BVR weapon. besides, since MICA-ER is not yet ready to come to the game, neither are python 5s and I doubt if it would be reasonable for gaijin to consider removing Derby and adding Python 5s
2 Likes
I don’t see any point. What for? You’re talking utter nonsense