Aye. Lots of older ones I’d love a chance to get again too. Might make a proper suggestion post for it now I think about it.
I’d never expect event vehicles to get re-run, but a PFP? It’s not like a non tradeable cosmetic item is going to affect the market or gameplay in anyway, and it’s easy GE sales for snail.
I know it does kind of ruin the exclusivity of them. Maybe release new versions for everyone to get?
I get the whole exclusivity point, and maybe people who grinded for them at the time will feel irked, but, it’s not like anyone couldn’t just buy it at the time.
I’m very sympathetic to this argument / viewpoint when it comes to vehicles, as re releasing those can directly influence market prices, and the influx of them alters gameplay. But PFP ain’t doing either.
I definitely do see the point though. Just feels a bit… pulling the ladder up behind oneself in this case to me.
I got plenty of kills with the AA-20 in sim. Even get kills in Air RB with the much harder to usr Rb05A. Why would the X4 be gimmicky?
hello I would like to know if one day you will implement certain game mechanics:
during a shot on a periscope of the driver or shooter if our view will be obstructed?
if one day the tank guns could be blocked by walls or other obstacles which would prevent us from turning the turret?
if one day you are going to implement a mechanic where the crew should put the breech back on its axis to reload the tank?
if one day Galix smoke systems could appear to thwart adversaries’ missiles?
I never saw image USAF F-15E armed GBU-54 Laser JDAM in late 2000’s
But I might believe gajin add GBU-54(V)1/B on F-15E someday
F-15I Ra’am and F-4E Kurnass 2000 armed AGM-142
At present, 3 Israel fighter aircraft from israel tech tree carry Rafael SPICE series
lol
let me tell you that if gaijin gives the Python-4 to japan first and not at the same time to both nations a bathblood is going to happen.
Either the R2Y2 line or the Ki-83 line, the latter ends at rank IV, while the Thai line would start at rank V.
Good thing they already denied ARM missiles for the near future lol.
Correct me if I’m wrong but didn’t BVVD say the R-77 and R-77-1 are not much different? UTTER BUNK!
If you look at the missile data sheet created by Koppany99 aka JohnWick(9) and Co-Authored by gszabi99 himself!
Burn time of booster: [S] R-77 = 6 Sec, R-77-1 = 2 Sec
Force exerted by booster: [N] R-77 = 23,000, R-77-1 = 34,500
Force exerted by sustainer: [N] R-77 = NA, R-77-1 = 18,400
Burn time of sustainer: [S] R-77 = NA, R-77-1 = 5 Sec
So…the R-77-1 puts out 23,000 more Newtons over its burn times then the R-77… -_- but their very similar, OK.
Not saying we should get the 77-1 atm, just saying they are not the same! Mentioned missile spread sheet below, make sure to select (ARH) tab.
Hold on CORRECTION! 23,000 Newtons I don’t think is correction…it’s 29,900 Newtons more. It’s not the out put over time, it’s that out put for the total time duration and the R-77 has no sustainer. Lord knows I’m not a math surgeon XD
I think the F-16 will go after the AJ, the F-5s and Gripen will be after the Ki-83 and the AV-8S(L), Alpha Jets F84G and the A7 will be after the R2Ys
I really do think the 77-1 would be fine right now, especially how draggy the 77 already is the -1 would likely be the same even with a different airframe
Also one other thing…there are NO drag stats anywhere in that document…soooo :/ would be nice to see
Itd likely end up the same then, and another thing Gaijin is actually limiting the AMRAAM in war thunder im not sure if its intentional but if you watch it in a replay it supposedly doesnt get anywhere near Mach 4
I wonder if the F84G and Alpha jets are meant to be replacements for the R2Y2s I doubt it
I don’t think so…I think because of the sustainer the 77-1 has it will give it more range even with the drag
Well I mean the same drag wise
isnt the R77-1 more akin to the early C AMRAAMs?
