AKA the no CAS ground battles that a lot of people actually want
Just play arcade lolllll
aka they implement ways for CAS to fight back because the people who think that SPAA will ever overpower CAS are delusional
Same thing with Russian Centauro/Freccia, it’s made to point out Gaijins mistakes with certain vehicle additions. Namely the Swedish Mi-28 or T 80 U
Well, good news for you that WT Live already covered it
2 Likes
R-77-1 to replace R-27R & R-27T on MiG-29SMT (9-19) with decompressed battle rating to 14.0
4 Fighter aircraft amed AIM-120C-5, I think
HELL NO
leave the SMT alone and just throw the 29M in after
3 Likes
I wish theyd just fix the damn engines and the SMT would be great
Id be legitimately fine with this. Better that as an event vehicle than something that should be in the tree like a bmd4m
I don’t really do ground battles, but I think that given how much we’ve complained about AAA in air battles it would be fair for there to be a pure ground RB game mode without CAS.
The balance of power shifts massively with the additionnof stationary SAMs like gaijins suggesting, JDAMs become viable and learning how to actually employ SEAD tactics will make CAS more rewarding and more focused on the SAM than on clueless tanks trying to play the game, I see patriot and S-300 as a hugely positive addition tbh
4 Likes
no it wouldnt be lol, it’d still be a fat pig
1 Like
Well, considering that the hq-17 is being added, I’m basically satisfied, it will be about at the level of the pantsir in terms of capabilities. Good air defense system.
Really? The thrust upgrade should make its flight performance the same as 9.13 no? Im sure it would almost anyway
thrust doesn’t fix a bad airframe, it just cushions the issue.
Thrust is only one part, you can’t change the weight issue though
Tree gore lol. I think it’s only fair that we are allowed to research the next vehicle in a line if we already posses the last vehicle in the folder preceding it. Obviously, this doesn’t count for an entire separate vehicle one might be missing. Also, the last vehicle in a folder should logically contribute research efficiency to the next vehicle. Someone made a good suggestion on this.
Should Gaijin allow you to research the next vehicle in a line if you possess the last vehicle in the folder directly preceding it?
- Yes
- No
0
voters
Please see this Gaijin :(
(Maybe I’ll make a suggestion or something if this gets popular, but this really feels like it should just be a minor tweak)
6 Likes
Who votes no for an overwhelmingly positive change
I didn’t understand the survey. Do you want it to be impossible to upgrade the next best technique until all the techniques from the folder are researched and purchased? That’s what the folder is for, to skip cars, to quickly pump the next one
