I got a unasked question
speaking of weapons tested is their plans to add the Aim-120 to the F-20 with a price increase?
The Yak141 is also planned with R-73/77 in mind, which would be cool too see, would not be OP if it is at a right BR as well.
Just take a look and the comment I responded to originally.
It is all about SU-33 as a possible premium.
My point is that that is to much capability for a premium. Some upgraded 3rd gen premiums are pushing 4th gen territory but adding the real deal be it a teen series jet, a Flanker, Fulcrum Eurocanard or something else on that level should never be added as a premium.
Certainly not for the forseeable future.
If you consider F-20 4th gen which can be done though I do not agree on that what would be the second 4th gen premium?
Would you consider Eurofighter or Rafale 5th gen since they incorporate rcs reducing shapes and materials and software?
You won’t go to work the next day after this, ye?)
We don’t currently plan ARH for the F-20 or MiG-21 Bison.
You will see thin in your dreams tonight
soooooooooooooo multinational vehicle goes to every nation that developped it right?
This,
The Yak-141 in game is a “what if” production version of the aircraft, the “what if” production version of the EAP is just the Eurofighter because it actually went to production
Sweden, China, Israël and domestic Japanese *air stuff?
The HQ-17 is domestic.
The Su-33 is most likely going under the Yak-141 right?
yeah, i meant to say air stuff
No.
EAP was a feasibility study i.e. a technology demonstrator.
bet its a premium hahaha
Fair.
Oh yeah, that would make sense as a naval line as there are no more Yaks
Who had that source that the rafale could only hold 6 missiles (at least the F3.2)
yak 130 one day will go under the 141
I’m sorry if this was asked before but where on that scale does the IAI Lavi fall?
As far as I’m aware the prototypes were only ever used for aerodynamic testing but there was a radar and armament planned for it.