Spoiler
You won’t see anything cuter today)
3 Likes
The JH-7A’s airborne rating needs to be downgraded, or its missiles strengthened. It’s hard to imagine that in 12.3 there were only four non-IRCCMs
1 Like
I kinda wish war thunder had leaned into the whole paper side rather than subtrees, even just a select few aircraft would have made trees so much more interesting
3 Likes
Hmm… Does my Black Death finally get Daggers to kill?
(though if its on the israeli tree, it wont ever fight them)
true… that thing is painful to play and grind.
The CAS ability is terrible as well… with only 115kg TNT GBU’s.
nah, its gonna be the Finger, trust
1 Like
War Thunder is the perfect place to test such vehicles.
2 Likes
Yeah, sadly Gaijin disagrees there :(
1 Like
Year 6. Waiting these missing vehicles in Japanese naval tech tree:
IJN Takao (1944/45), IJN Maya (1944), IJN Atago (1941), IJN Ashigara (1941), IJN Kagero (1941), IJN Yukikaze (1945), IJN Shiratsuyu (1943), IJN Fubuki (1928), IJN Hibiki (1944), IJN Kitakami (1941), IJN Ōyodo (1944), IJN Tenryū (1942), IJN Akikaze (1943), IJN Hiei (1942), IJN Yahagi (1945), IJN Fuyutsuki (1945)
6 Likes
I’d really love for some of the weird Gnat prototypes and developments, they’re a right lark.
Maybe we could get an F.2, they did build the wing, although the project was cancelled cause Bristol wouldn’t make an afterburner, would have been a nice F-100 equivalent.
The Fo.147 would have been cool too, twin engined VGW tailplaneless Gnat
3 Likes
The domestic europe 4.5 generation fighter show in trailer
But first devblog season might be vehicle low tier or mid tier
Very very unlikely.
ENAER Pantera…
Kitakami!!
4 Likes
just made a guess lol
no devblog today
God, the wing sweep Gnat and the wing sweep Lightning would be so cool to have
2 Likes
Would have also been better for filling out trees than the failure(as of right now) that is the sub-tree system.
1 Like
Real thats why I checked on this thread. But yeah no its a possibility as the wing was built.
2 Likes