Yes, announced the last friday
Sadly, I don’t know now
1 Like
I’m hopeful for this, but really as long as I get an Oplot M I’ll be happy. Everything else is just an added bonus.
(And maybe also a Commando Stingray)
Well no, with gajins shenanigans i dont consider a line of thai vehicles a declaration that it is a sub tree xD
Thanks, I’ll stay both hopeful and copeful that there will be some vehicles I’ll enjoy.
PL-9C is just slightly better than PL-8B because of the quad element seeker and better wings.
1 Like
With the same success, we can say that py4 is only slightly better than py3 because it does not have much better homing head and steering wheels
Uhh… The Python 4 is known for being able to hit targets behind the firing aircraft…
Last I checked, the Python 3 couldn’t do anything like that.
That’s the Python 5, not 4.
1 Like
No Python 4 can do that
1 Like
The only difference between the Python 4 and Python 5 is that the 4 has a dual band seeker (like the AAM-3) and the 5 has an IIR seeker (like the Type 81)
There’s more to it than that, actually.
1 Like
Hi smin, whats on the table today?
Well yes and no, python 4 can’t lock targets behind it, or use local.
Python 4 has 180 degree (half sphere) capabilities so if you fired at a plane Infront of you, and then that plane flew last then the missile would do 180 and follow that plane
From my knowledge p4 has no loal
1 Like
True, but for gameplay purposes that’s the only change that would make any substantial difference.
I think it depends how gaijin models full sphere capabilities
IMO they’d just make the missiles agile enough to whip around on people in a turnfight. Not much to do differently there tbh.
It doesn’t have TVC, which definitely makes a fairly large difference for the game.
Yeah not lock behind but can get a plane that ends up behind
4 Likes